Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Assessment of Developmental Progress Using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination-Simulation Hybrid Examination
Abigail Ford Winkel1, Colleen Gillespie2, Kristen Uquillas3
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine.
Objective:
The Test of Integrated Professional Skills (TIPS) is an objective structured clinical examination-simulation hybrid examination that assesses resident integration of technical, cognitive, and affective skills in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residents. The aim of this study was to analyze performance patterns and reactions of residents to the test to understand how it may fit within a comprehensive assessment program.
Design:
A retrospective, mixed methods review of the design and implementation of the examination, patterns of performance of trainees at different levels of training, focus group data, and description of use of TIPS results for resident remediation and curriculum development.
Setting:
OBGYN residents at New York University Langone Medical Center, a tertiary-care, urban academic health center.
Participants:
OBGYN residents in all years of training, postgraduate year-1 through postgraduate year, all residents completing the TIPS examination and consenting to participate in focus groups were included.
Results:
In all, 24 residents completed the TIPS examination. Performance on the examination varied widely among individuals at each stage of training, and did not follow developmental trends, except for technical skills. Cronbach α for both standardized patient and faculty ratings ranged from 0.69 to 0.84, suggesting internal consistency. Focus group results indicated that residents respond to the TIPS examination in complex ways, ranging from anxiety about performance to mixed feelings about how to use the data for their learning.
Conclusion:
TIPS assesses a range of attributes, and can support both formative and summative evaluation. Lack of clear developmental differences and wide variation in performance by learners at the same level of training support the argument for individualized learning plans and competency-based education.
More Related Videos
19:15Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System II: Inspection and Palpation
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....