Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

10:35
Simultaneous PET/MRI Imaging During Mouse Cerebral Hypoxia-ischemia
Published on: September 20, 2015
12.9K
Fully automated calculation of image-derived input function in simultaneous PET/MRI in a sheep model
Thies H Jochimsen1, Vilia Zeisig2, Jessica Schulz3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, Leipzig, Germany. Thies.Jochimsen@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
EJNMMI Physics
|February 14, 2016
Summary
This study presents an automated method for deriving arterial input function (AIF) from PET/MRI scans, offering a non-invasive alternative to blood sampling. The image-derived input function (IDIF) shows promise for accurate quantification in dynamic PET imaging.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Nuclear Medicine
- Biophysics
Background:
- Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) requires an arterial input function (AIF) for accurate quantification.
- Arterial blood sampling is invasive; image-derived input function (IDIF) offers a non-invasive alternative.
- Simultaneous PET/MRI allows high-resolution angiography for PVE and PSF correction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a fully automated method for obtaining the IDIF in PET/MRI.
- To compare the performance of the automated IDIF method against manual arterial blood sampling.
- To assess the accuracy of IDIF in quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF).
Main Methods:
- Segmentation of major neck arteries using enhanced MRI angiography.
- Application of a vessel-enhancement filter based on the inertia tensor.
- Geometrical deconvolution using segmented arterial mask and measured PET point spread function (PSF).
Main Results:
- A cross-calibration factor of 0.98 ± 0.10 was achieved between IDIF and blood samples during steady state.
- The IDIF demonstrated an earlier and sharper bolus peak compared to arterial blood sampling.
- Cerebral blood flow (CBF) calculated using IDIF was 22% higher than that from arterial blood sampling.
Conclusions:
- The automated IDIF method effectively corrects for partial-volume effects (PVE) and PSF.
- Discrepancies in CBF values are attributed to differences in sampling site delay and dispersion.
- Further research will focus on human studies to replace invasive blood sampling with IDIF in PET/MRI.

