Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
Published on: July 24, 2010
Robustness of the Quadratic Discriminant Function to correlated and uncorrelated normal training samples
Atinuke Adebanji1, Michael Asamoah-Boaheng2, Olivia Osei-Tutu3
1Department of Mathematics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana ; Institute of Research, Innovation and Development (IRID), Kumasi Polytechnic, Box 854, Kumasi, Ghana.
Abstract:
This study investigates the asymptotic performance of the Quadratic Discriminant Function (QDF) under correlated and uncorrelated normal training samples. This paper specifically examines the effect of correlation, uncorrelation considering different sample size ratios, number of variables and varying group centroid separators ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) on classification accuracy of the QDF using simulated data from three populations ([Formula: see text]). The three populations differs with respect to their mean vector and covariance matrices. The results show the correlated normal distribution exhibits high coefficient of variation as [Formula: see text] increased. The QDF performed better when the training samples were correlated than when they were under uncorrelated normal distribution. The QDF performed better resulting in the reduction in misclassification error rates as group centroid separator increases with non increasing sample size under correlated training samples.
Related Concept Videos
Quadratic Models
Quadratic Equations
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
Quadratic Equations in the Complex Number System
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

