Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Preparation of Stable Bicyclic Aziridinium Ions and Their Ring-Opening for the Synthesis of Azaheterocycles
Published on: August 22, 2018
Understanding the anion-π interactions with tetraoxacalix[2]arene[2]triazine
1Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, MOE Laboratory for Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China. xxchem@fudan.edu.cn.
Abstract:
Anion-π interaction is a new type of non-covalent interaction. It has attracted growing interest in recent years both theoretically and experimentally. However, the nature of bonding between an anion and an electron-deficient aromatic system has remained elusive. To understand the bonding nature in depth, we have carried out a systematic computational study, using model systems that involve tetraoxacalix[2]arene[2]triazine 1, an electron-deficient macrocyclic host, and four anions, X(-) (X(-) = SCN(-), NO3(-), BF4(-), and PF6(-)), of varied sizes and shapes. The geometries for the 1·X(-) complexes were optimized using the extended ONIOM (XO) method. The good agreements with the X-ray experimental results provide a validation of our theoretical schemes. The nature of the non-covalent interactions was analyzed with the help of the AIM (atoms in molecules), RDG (reduced density gradient) and LMO-EDA (local molecular orbital-energy decomposition analysis) methods. The results clearly reveal the involvement of anion-π bonding, as well as a weak, yet significant, hydrogen bonding interaction between the benzene C-H on 1 and the anion of NO3(-) or PF6(-). The bonding energies of 1·X(-) were calculated with the XYG3 functional, and the results were compared with those from MP2, M06-2X and some other functionals with non-covalent interaction corrections (e.g., B3LYP-D3, and ωB97X-D). We conclude that the binding strengths follow the order of 1·NO3(-) > 1·SCN(-) > 1·BF4(-) > 1·PF6(-), where the difference between 1·SCN(-) and 1·BF4(-) is less significant. The strongest interaction in 1·NO3(-) comes from: (1) the effective electronic interaction between NO3(-) and the triazine rings on 1; and (2) the weak hydrogen bonding interaction between the benzene C-H on 1 and nitrate, which cooperates with the anion-π interactions.
More Related Videos
06:35Construction and Systematical Symmetric Studies of a Series of Supramolecular Clusters with Binary or Ternary Ammonium Triphenylacetates
Published on: February 15, 2016
07:56Preparation of 6-aminocyclohepta-2,4-dien-1-one Derivatives via Tricarbonyltroponeiron
Published on: August 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Cations: Structural Overview
Removing one hydrogen from the intervening CH2 group...
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Anions: Structural Overview
Due to the absence of continuous...
Aryldiazonium Salts to Azo Dyes: Diazo Coupling
Electrophilic Addition to Alkynes: Halogenation
Halogenation is another class of electrophilic addition reactions where a halogen molecule gets added across a π bond. In alkynes, the presence of two π bonds allows for the addition of two equivalents of halogens (bromine or chlorine). The addition of the first halogen molecule forms a trans-dihaloalkene as the major product and the cis isomer as the minor product. Subsequent addition of the second equivalent yields the tetrahalide.
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Diazonium Group Substitution: –OH and –H