Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Initial Nutritional Assessment of Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Interventions and Return to Birth Weight
Insights
Nutritional support for newborns with cleft lip and/or palate varies by cleft type. Infants with cleft palate (CP) showed slower weight gain and less breastfeeding than those with cleft lip (CL).
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Craniofacial Anomalies
- Healthcare Practices
Background:
- Neonatal nutritional support is critical for infants with cleft lip and/or palate.
- Cleft team practices regarding nutrition require assessment to ensure optimal infant outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and quantify the nutritional support practices of cleft teams for newborns with cleft lip and/or palate.
- To identify differences in nutritional support and outcomes based on cleft type.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 100 consecutive newborn patients diagnosed with cleft lip and/or palate between 2009 and 2012.
- Data collected included birth weight, cleft type, feeding practices, nutritional interventions, and follow-up assessments.
- All patients were evaluated by a registered dietitian and an occupational feeding therapist.
Main Results:
- Infants with cleft lip (CL) returned to birth weight faster (13.58 days) than those with cleft lip and palate (CLP) (15.88 days) or cleft palate (CP) (21.93 days).
- Exclusive breastfeeding was more common in CL (50%) compared to CLP (30.3%) and CP (21.4%).
- CP infants were least likely to receive any breast milk, and CLP and CP infants required more frequent nutritional interventions.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences exist in neonatal weight gain and feeding practices among cleft types.
- Cleft lip infants generally required fewer interventions and had better breastfeeding rates.
- Cleft palate infants, particularly isolated CP, demonstrated slower weight recovery and less breastfeeding, necessitating tailored nutritional interventions.
Objective:
To assess and quantify cleft team practices with regard to nutritional support in the neonatal period Design : Retrospective review.
Setting:
Tertiary pediatric hospital.
Patients:
One hundred consecutive newborn patients with a diagnosis of cleft lip and/or cleft palate between 2009 and 2012.
Main Outcome Measures:
Birth weight, cleft type, initial cleft team weight measurements, initial feeding practices, recommended nutritional interventions, and follow-up nutritional assessments.
Results:
All patients in the study were evaluated by a registered dietitian and an occupational feeding therapist. Average birth weight and average age at the first cleft team visit were similar for each cleft type: cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and palate (CLP), and cleft palate (CP). The calculated age (in days) for return to birth weight was significantly different between cleft types: CL = 13.58 days, CLP = 15.88 days, and CP = 21.93 days. Exclusive use of breast milk was 50% for patients with CL, 30.3% for patients with CLP, and 21.4% for patients with CP. Detailed nutritional interventions were made for 31 patients at the first visit: two with CL, 14 with CLP, and 15 with CP.
Conclusions:
Distinct differences were seen in neonatal weight gain between cleft types. There was significantly greater total weight gain for patients with CL at their first visit and significantly slower return to birth weight for patients with isolated CP. Patients with CL required far fewer interventions at the initial assessment and were more likely to be provided breast milk exclusively or in combination with formula. Infants with CP were far less likely to receive any breast milk. Patients with CLP and CP required frequent nutritional interventions.
More Related Videos
05:04A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
06:19Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.