Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test
Published on: June 6, 2025
Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance
Anthea Pun1, Susan A J Birch2, Andrew Scott Baron2
1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 antheacp@psych.ubc.ca.
Insights
Infants as young as 6 months can understand social dominance, using numerical group size to predict outcomes. This early social cognition develops before sensitivity to physical size cues.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Social Cognition
Background:
- Detecting dominance hierarchies offers a survival advantage by minimizing injury risk during competition.
- Previous studies showed 10-13 month olds use physical size to infer dominance, but younger infants' abilities were unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if infants younger than 10 months use numerical group size to assess dominance.
- To determine if this numerical group size sensitivity emerges before size-based dominance understanding.
Main Methods:
- Three studies were conducted involving infants aged 6-12 months.
- Infants' expectations of competition outcomes were observed based on differing numerical group sizes of agents.
Main Results:
- Infants aged 6-12 months infer dominance from numerical group size.
- Preverbal infants anticipate the agent from a larger group winning a competition.
- This study demonstrates 6-9 month olds understand social dominance relations.
Conclusions:
- Infants' understanding of social dominance is rooted in evolutionarily relevant cues.
- Early sensitivity to group size reflects an adaptive function of social groups in survival.
Abstract:
Detecting dominance relationships, within and across species, provides a clear fitness advantage because this ability helps individuals assess their potential risk of injury before engaging in a competition. Previous research has demonstrated that 10- to 13-mo-old infants can represent the dominance relationship between two agents in terms of their physical size (larger agent = more dominant), whereas younger infants fail to do so. It is unclear whether infants younger than 10 mo fail to represent dominance relationships in general, or whether they lack sensitivity to physical size as a cue to dominance. Two studies explored whether infants, like many species across the animal kingdom, use numerical group size to assess dominance relationships and whether this capacity emerges before their sensitivity to physical size. A third study ruled out an alternative explanation for our findings. Across these studies, we report that infants 6-12 mo of age use numerical group size to infer dominance relationships. Specifically, preverbal infants expect an agent from a numerically larger group to win in a right-of-way competition against an agent from a numerically smaller group. In addition, this is, to our knowledge, the first study to demonstrate that infants 6-9 mo of age are capable of understanding social dominance relations. These results demonstrate that infants' understanding of social dominance relations may be based on evolutionarily relevant cues and reveal infants' early sensitivity to an important adaptive function of social groups.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Adler's Individual Psychology
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...

