Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ambiguities of Angle's classification.

D J Rinchuse1, D J Rinchuse

  • 1University of Pittsburgh, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, PA 15261.

The Angle Orthodontist
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The wisdom behind third molar extractions.

Australian dental journal·2010
Same author

The use of educational-psychological principles in orthodontic practice.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2001
Same author

The craniofacial morphology of bruxers versus nonbruxers.

The Angle orthodontist·1999
Same author

Reliability of three methods of occlusion classification.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·1998
Same author

Customizing archwires with a stop plier.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·1998
Same author

A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United States.

Community dentistry and oral epidemiology·1997
Same journal

Impact of cone-beam computed tomography image quality on artificial intelligence-driven three-dimensional tooth segmentation and evaluation of external apical root resorption.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Bracket transfer accuracy of two three-dimensionally printed lingual indirect bonding trays with different bracket frame designs.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical impact of beveling design on extrusion of a maxillary canine and a maxillary first molar: an in vitro and finite element analysis study.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of resin-modified glass ionomer vs composite bonding agents for orthodontic bonding: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Plastic deformation evaluation of clear aligners exposed to different cleaning solutions.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Quantitative evaluation of an artificial intelligence-driven remote monitoring system for occlusion assessment using patient-captured images.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
See all related articles

Edward Angle's orthodontic classification system, initially considering all teeth, later focused on maxillary first molars, causing confusion. This study discusses the limitations of this approach and variable classification criteria.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dental Morphology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Edward H. Angle's foundational work in orthodontics.
  • The evolution of Angle's classification system from 1900 to 1907.
  • The importance of reference teeth in orthodontic diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the ambiguities arising from sole reliance on Angle's classification system.
  • To explore the distinction between discrete and continuous variables in case classification.
  • To highlight the need for a comprehensive approach in orthodontic assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of Edward H. Angle's historical contributions to orthodontic classification.
  • Discussion of the theoretical criteria differentiating discrete and continuous variables.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of potential confusion points within Angle's system.

    • Main Results:

    • Solely relying on Angle's system, particularly the use of maxillary first molars, leads to classification confusion.
    • The criteria for discrete versus continuous variables are crucial for accurate case assessment.
    • A nuanced understanding of classification variables is necessary for robust orthodontic diagnosis.

    Conclusions:

    • Angle's classification system, while historically significant, presents limitations when used exclusively.
    • Understanding variable types is essential for resolving diagnostic ambiguities in orthodontics.
    • A more comprehensive approach beyond fixed reference teeth is advocated.