Taking Risk: Early Results From Teaching Hospitals' Participation in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation

Coleen Kivlahan1, Janis M Orlowski, Jonathan Pearce

  • 1C. Kivlahan is senior director, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J.M. Orlowski is chief health care officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J. Pearce is principal, Singletrack Analytics, Woodbury, New Jersey. J. Walradt is senior payment reform specialist, Alternative Payment, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. M. Baker is research analyst, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. D.G. Kirch is president and chief executive officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.

Insights

The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative showed varied financial results across medical episodes. Teaching hospitals participating in this program achieved savings in some areas like joint replacements but experienced losses in others.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Healthcare Economics
  • Clinical Operations

Background:

  • The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) introduced the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative in 2011 to encourage value-based care.
  • BPCI involves Medicare payment arrangements where healthcare providers assume financial risk for defined episodes of care.
  • The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) facilitated a cohort of 27 teaching hospitals participating in the BPCI initiative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the initial observations and financial outcomes of teaching hospitals participating in the CMMI's BPCI initiative.
  • To identify factors influencing savings and losses within bundled payment models for specific clinical episodes.
  • To provide insights for future research on alternative payment models in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Observations from 27 teaching hospitals within the AAMC cohort participating in the BPCI initiative.
  • Analysis of financial results for selected episodes of care, including congestive heart failure (CHF), major joint replacement (MJR), and cardiac valve surgery.
  • Evaluation of factors such as post-acute care utilization, care process changes, and team composition.

Main Results:

  • The first cohort of BPCI participants generated savings in MJR, CHF, and cardiac valve surgery episodes.
  • Losses were observed in episodes including stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention, and spine surgery.
  • Early financial performance was influenced by post-acute care management, care process modifications, and program pricing.

Conclusions:

  • Focused efforts on post-acute care, process improvements, and team dynamics significantly impacted BPCI program outcomes.
  • Despite participation from a quarter of U.S. teaching hospitals, the evolving landscape of payment models necessitates ongoing evaluation of BPCI.
  • Further research into alternative payment models is recommended given the proliferation of new payment strategies and the shift towards value-based reimbursement.

Related Concept Videos

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
3.6K
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System01:29

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
6.4K
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
4.2K
Integrated Healthcare System01:20

Integrated Healthcare System

An integrated healthcare system (IHS) is a set of organizations that provides for or arranges to provide coordinated and continuous service to a defined population. The IHS takes responsibility for that particular population's health status and outcome, both clinically and fiscally. An integrated healthcare system is a well-organized, well-coordinated, and collaborative network. The integrated delivery system is a network that connects different healthcare providers to deliver organized,...
2.6K
Nursing Clinical Information System01:27

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
1.4K
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
3.3K