Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Taking Risk: Early Results From Teaching Hospitals' Participation in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation
Coleen Kivlahan1, Janis M Orlowski, Jonathan Pearce
1C. Kivlahan is senior director, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J.M. Orlowski is chief health care officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J. Pearce is principal, Singletrack Analytics, Woodbury, New Jersey. J. Walradt is senior payment reform specialist, Alternative Payment, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. M. Baker is research analyst, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. D.G. Kirch is president and chief executive officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
Abstract:
The authors describe observations from the 27 teaching hospitals constituting the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) cohort in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative. CMMI introduced BPCI in August 2011 and selected the first set of participants in January 2013. BPCI participants enter into Medicare payment arrangements for episodes of care for which they take financial risk. The first round of participants entered risk agreements on October 1, 2013 and January 1, 2014. In April 2014, CMMI selected additional participants who started taking financial risk in 2015. Selected episodes include congestive heart failure (CHF), major joint replacement (MJR), and cardiac valve surgery. The AAMC cohort of participating hospitals selected clinical conditions on the basis of patient volume, opportunity to impact savings and quality, organizational and clinical team readiness, and prior process improvement experience. Early financial results suggest that focused attention to postacute care utilization and outcomes, rapid changes in care processes, program pricing rules, and team composition drove savings and losses. The first cohort of participants generated savings in MJR, CHF, and cardiac valve episodes; losses were experienced in stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention, and spine surgery. Although about one-quarter of U.S. teaching hospitals are participating in BPCI, the proliferation of existing and new payment models, as well as the 2015 announcement to increasingly pay providers according to value, mandates close scrutiny of program outcomes. The authors conclude by proposing additional opportunities for research related to alternative payment models.
Insights
The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative showed varied financial results across medical episodes. Teaching hospitals participating in this program achieved savings in some areas like joint replacements but experienced losses in others.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Healthcare Economics
- Clinical Operations
Background:
- The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) introduced the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative in 2011 to encourage value-based care.
- BPCI involves Medicare payment arrangements where healthcare providers assume financial risk for defined episodes of care.
- The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) facilitated a cohort of 27 teaching hospitals participating in the BPCI initiative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the initial observations and financial outcomes of teaching hospitals participating in the CMMI's BPCI initiative.
- To identify factors influencing savings and losses within bundled payment models for specific clinical episodes.
- To provide insights for future research on alternative payment models in healthcare.
Main Methods:
- Observations from 27 teaching hospitals within the AAMC cohort participating in the BPCI initiative.
- Analysis of financial results for selected episodes of care, including congestive heart failure (CHF), major joint replacement (MJR), and cardiac valve surgery.
- Evaluation of factors such as post-acute care utilization, care process changes, and team composition.
Main Results:
- The first cohort of BPCI participants generated savings in MJR, CHF, and cardiac valve surgery episodes.
- Losses were observed in episodes including stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention, and spine surgery.
- Early financial performance was influenced by post-acute care management, care process modifications, and program pricing.
Conclusions:
- Focused efforts on post-acute care, process improvements, and team dynamics significantly impacted BPCI program outcomes.
- Despite participation from a quarter of U.S. teaching hospitals, the evolving landscape of payment models necessitates ongoing evaluation of BPCI.
- Further research into alternative payment models is recommended given the proliferation of new payment strategies and the shift towards value-based reimbursement.
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Integrated Healthcare System
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Patient-centered Care
