Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

685
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
685
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

6.7K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
6.7K
Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

1.1K
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Utility and User Experience with 3-Dimensional Vibrotactile Kinesthetic Feedback for Improving Reach-to-Grasp Accuracy and Efficiency After Stroke: A Case Series.

Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2026
Same author

A composite measure of cerebral small vessel disease predicts cognitive change after stroke.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

CALM-VLM: CALIBRATION AND SELECTIVE PREDICTION IN VISION-LANGUAGE MODELS FOR RELIABLE BRAIN MRI CLASSIFICATION.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Effects of <i>Lacticaseibacillus paracasei</i> HP7 Against <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>-Induced Gastric Mucosal Inflammation and Mucosal Protection.

Journal of medicinal food·2026
Same author

Exploration of genes and identification of evolutionary evidence in adeno-associated viruses.

Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)·2026
Same author

GPR54 regulates non-small cell lung cancer development via dopa decarboxylase.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

22.4K

Optimal Schedules in Multitask Motor Learning.

Jeong Yoon Lee1, Youngmin Oh2, Sung Shin Kim3

  • 1Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, U.S.A. ethielee@gmail.com.

Neural Computation
|February 19, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimizing motor learning schedules is key for sports and rehabilitation. Intermixing tasks, especially when they interfere, enhances long-term retention, making alternating schedules effective for skill acquisition.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.2K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder
08:51

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

22.4K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.2K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder
08:51

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Motor learning and control
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Sports science and rehabilitation

Background:

  • Maximizing long-term retention in motor learning is crucial for sports training and neurorehabilitation.
  • Current strategies for scheduling multiple tasks lack clear theoretical guidance, especially concerning task interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a predictive theoretical framework for optimizing task scheduling in motor learning.
  • To determine task-selection strategies that maximize long-term retention using computational models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized optimal control theory and computational models of motor adaptation.
  • Derived a control law using Pontryagin's maximum principle to guide trial-by-trial task choice.
  • Simulated a single session of adaptation with two tasks under varying difficulty and interference levels.

Main Results:

  • Identified conditions where alternating task schedules are optimal, particularly when task interference is high.
  • Optimal schedules prioritize the more difficult task only when task difficulties differ significantly.
  • Alternating schedules demonstrated near-optimal long-term retention performance across tested parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Predicts that intermixing tasks with equal trial distribution is an effective strategy for enhancing long-term retention in many learning scenarios.
  • Provides a theoretical basis for designing effective motor learning and rehabilitation protocols.
  • Highlights the importance of task scheduling in overcoming interference for improved skill consolidation.