Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gender-Affirming Rhinoplasty: A Scoping Review.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Analysis of Cephalometric Differences of the Midface and Upper Face in Males and Females: A Radiographic Study.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2024
Same author

Feminization Rhinoplasty.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2023
Same author

Analysis of Cephalometric Points in Male and Female Mandibles: An Application to Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2023
Same author

Patient-Reported Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Underlay Articulated Alar Rim Grafts in Functional Septorhinoplasty.

Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine·2022
Same author

3D-Printed Custom Cutting Guides Facilitate Frontal Cranioplasty in Gender Affirmation Surgery.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.4K

Reconstructive Rhinoplasty Using Multiplanar Carved Costal Cartilage.

Michael J Nuara1, Randall B Loch2, Sarah A Saxon3

  • 1Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington2Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
|February 20, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study explores a new method for reconstructive rhinoplasty using costal cartilage. The technique involves carving the cartilage in three dimensions to better match the nose's natural structure. This approach may help reduce a common issue called warping, where the graft changes shape over time. The researchers reviewed 11 patients who underwent the procedure and found no major complications. All patients reported improved breathing and appearance. The results suggest this method could be a reliable option for complex nasal reconstructions.

Keywords:
costal cartilagerhinoplasty techniquesnasal reconstructionautologous grafts

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.5K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.4K
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.5K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • Otolaryngology
  • Tissue Engineering in Surgery

Background:

Reconstructive rhinoplasty frequently involves cartilage grafts to correct complex nasal deformities. Autologous costal cartilage is a preferred material due to its size and structural integrity. However, warping of the graft remains a known complication. Prior research has shown that rib cartilage can be prone to deformation over time. This issue limits long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes. Surgeons have explored various techniques to mitigate this risk. Some studies suggest that preoperative shaping may reduce warping. Yet, no prior work had resolved the challenge of maintaining graft stability in all planes. This gap motivated the development of a multiplanar carving approach to enhance graft predictability.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal of this study was to evaluate a multiplanar carving technique for costal cartilage in reconstructive rhinoplasty. The researchers aimed to determine if this method could reduce warping and improve outcomes. Complex nasal deformities often require precise graft shaping. Traditional methods may not fully address multiplanar anatomical needs. The team hypothesized that three-dimensional carving could better mimic nasal anatomy. They also wanted to assess functional and aesthetic results. Patients with septal and upper lateral cartilage deficiencies were selected. The study focused on whether this technique could yield consistent and stable grafts.

Main Methods:

The researchers conducted a retrospective review of 11 reconstructive rhinoplasty cases. All patients had complex nasal deformities and underwent open rhinoplasty. A full-thickness costal cartilage graft was harvested from each patient. The cartilage was then carved in three dimensions to match nasal anatomy. The graft curvature was removed to create a uniform block. The multiplanar approach was used to redefine anatomical relationships. Postoperative assessments included nasal airway function and aesthetic outcomes. NOSE scores were recorded at least three months after surgery to evaluate improvement.

Main Results:

Eleven patients underwent reconstruction using the multiplanar costal cartilage technique. The most common application was for septal and upper lateral cartilage reconstruction. No major complications were reported during the follow-up period. Graft warping was not observed in any of the patients. Several patients required minor revision procedures. All participants reported improved nasal airway function. Aesthetic outcomes were also reported as satisfactory. NOSE scores indicated a significant improvement in nasal obstruction symptoms. These results suggest the technique may offer better graft stability and predictability.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that multiplanar costal cartilage grafting is a useful technique for complex nasal reconstruction. The method may help reduce the risk of graft warping. It allows for precise shaping to match nasal anatomy in three dimensions. The absence of warping in this study supports its potential effectiveness. The researchers suggest this approach may improve both functional and aesthetic outcomes. The technique appears to be safe, with no major complications reported. Minor revisions were necessary in some cases but did not affect overall success. The results may encourage further exploration of this method in reconstructive surgery.

The technique may reduce graft warping and improve anatomical accuracy in complex nasal reconstructions.

A full-thickness rib cartilage block is harvested and curved portions are removed to create a uniform shape.

It allows the graft to better mimic natural nasal anatomy and resist deformation over time.

Nasal airway function, aesthetic appearance, and NOSE scores were assessed postoperatively.

No patients experienced graft warping during the 3 to 36-month follow-up period.

The researchers propose that the method may offer optimal and predictable results for complex nasal reconstruction.