Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency
Published on: June 10, 2018
Whole-genome mutational burden analysis of three pluripotency induction methods
Kunal Bhutani1, Kristopher L Nazor2, Roy Williams2
1Scripps Translational Science Institute and The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine. La Jolla, California 92037. USA.
Abstract:
There is concern that the stresses of inducing pluripotency may lead to deleterious DNA mutations in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines, which would compromise their use for cell therapies. Here we report comparative genomic analysis of nine isogenic iPSC lines generated using three reprogramming methods: integrating retroviral vectors, non-integrating Sendai virus and synthetic mRNAs. We used whole-genome sequencing and de novo genome mapping to identify single-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, and structural variants. Our results show a moderate number of variants in the iPSCs that were not evident in the parental fibroblasts, which may result from reprogramming. There were only small differences in the total numbers and types of variants among different reprogramming methods. Most importantly, a thorough genomic analysis showed that the variants were generally benign. We conclude that the process of reprogramming is unlikely to introduce variants that would make the cells inappropriate for therapy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combinatorial Gene Control
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
In vitro Mutagenesis
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming

