Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

06:43
The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
Published on: July 26, 2013
16.7K
Modality dependence and intermodal transfer in the Corsi Spatial Sequence Task: Screen vs. Floor
Andrea Röser1, Gregor Hardiess1, Hanspeter A Mallot2
1Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Department of Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Experimental Brain Research
|February 20, 2016
Summary
Performance on the Corsi Spatial Sequence Task (CSST) is affected by how it is presented and recalled. Walking-based recall (Floor conditions) increases demands on spatial working memory, impairing performance compared to screen-based tasks.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Factors
Background:
- The Corsi Spatial Sequence Task (CSST) is a standard measure of spatial working memory.
- Previous research highlights the spatial processing demands inherent in the CSST.
- The impact of integrating physical movement (walking) into CSST recall remains less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different presentation and reproduction modalities affect performance on the CSST.
- To determine the specific spatial working memory processes engaged by screen-based versus walking-based CSST versions.
- To examine the combined effects of encoding and recall modalities on spatial task performance.
Main Methods:
- A within-subject design tested four CSST modality conditions: Screen-Screen, Screen-Floor, Floor-Screen, and Floor-Floor.
- Encoding involved visual presentation on a screen or spatial layout on a floor.
- Recall involved screen-based reproduction or actual walking to reproduce the sequence.
Main Results:
- Performance decreased with increasing sequence length, consistent with working memory limitations.
- The Screen-Screen condition yielded the best performance.
- Walking-based recall conditions (Floor-Screen, Floor-Floor, Screen-Floor) significantly impaired performance due to increased spatial demands like reference frame transformation and spatial updating.
Conclusions:
- The CSST's spatial demands are amplified when walking is involved in the recall phase.
- Walking-based CSST requires additional working memory resources for spatial updating, reference frame transformation, and motor control.
- These findings suggest that physical embodiment influences spatial working memory capacity and task performance.

