Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review: indictment, trial and beyond.

J D Hudson, M D Ravreby

    Iowa Medicine : Journal of the Iowa Medical Society
    |December 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary

    The Peer Review Improvement Act created a disciplinary process that negatively impacts medical practitioners. This review examines the challenges and problems practitioners face within this system.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Loss-of-function genetics in mammalian cells: the p53 tumor suppressor model.

    Nucleic acids research·2000
    Same author

    p16INK4A and p19ARF act in overlapping pathways in cellular immortalization.

    Nature cell biology·2000
    Same author

    A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits p53 tumor suppressor activity.

    The Journal of experimental medicine·1999
    Same author

    Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1995
    Same author

    Evaluation of multiple-marker screening for Down syndrome in a statewide population.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1993
    Same author

    Sequence of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe gtp1 gene and identification of a novel family of putative GTP-binding proteins.

    Gene·1993

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Healthcare Policy
    • Professional Regulation

    Background:

    • The Peer Review Improvement Act established a formal disciplinary process for healthcare practitioners.
    • Understanding the practical implications of this act is crucial for healthcare professionals.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the disciplinary process mandated by the Peer Review Improvement Act.
    • To identify and discuss the specific problems encountered by practitioners within this system.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of the Peer Review Improvement Act and related legal documents.
    • Analysis of case studies and practitioner feedback regarding the disciplinary process.

    Main Results:

    • The disciplinary process presents significant procedural and practical challenges for practitioners.
    • Issues include lack of transparency, lengthy review times, and potential for unfair sanctions.

    Conclusions:

    • The current disciplinary framework under the Peer Review Improvement Act requires re-evaluation.
    • Recommendations for improving the process to ensure fairness and efficiency for practitioners are needed.

    Related Experiment Videos