Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

09:30
Synthetic Antigen Controls for Immunohistochemistry
Published on: August 23, 2021
3.1K
Immunohistochemical Labelling for Cyclo-oxygenase-2: Does the Positive Control Guarantee Standardized Results?
S Belluco1, P Carnier2, M Castagnaro2
1Equipe Recherche UPSP ICE 2011-03-101: Oncology, Vetagro-sup, Campus Vétérinaire, 1 Avenue Bourgelat, Marcy l'etoile, France.
Journal of Comparative Pathology
|February 21, 2016
Summary
Reproducibility in veterinary oncology research is challenging. A renal macula densa positive control did not ensure consistent cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression results across labs, highlighting the need for automated analysis.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Oncology
- Immunohistochemistry
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) is a therapeutic target in veterinary oncology.
- Previous studies on COX-2 expression show heterogeneous results, hindering definitive conclusions.
- Reproducibility issues necessitate standardized controls in multi-laboratory studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of a defined positive control in ensuring reproducible cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression analysis.
- To evaluate inter-laboratory and inter-reader variability in immunohistochemical assessment of COX-2 in veterinary tumors.
- To determine if renal macula densa positivity is a sufficient control for reliable COX-2 quantification.
Main Methods:
- Immunohistochemical labeling of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) in 15 colorectal tumors and 15 oral squamous cell carcinomas.
- Six European laboratories participated, using a defined positive control (renal macula densa).
- Blinded evaluation of slides by three pathologists for percentage of positive cells and labeling intensity, followed by statistical analysis.
Main Results:
- Renal macula densa positivity proved insufficient to guarantee reproducible results for COX-2 percentage of positive cells and labeling intensity.
- Significant inter-reader variability was statistically confirmed among pathologists.
- The defined positive control failed to standardize COX-2 expression analysis across different laboratories.
Conclusions:
- Standard positive controls, such as renal macula densa, may not be adequate for ensuring reproducible COX-2 expression analysis in veterinary oncology.
- Significant inter-reader variability necessitates the adoption of automated quantitative evaluation techniques, like image analysis, to improve consistency and reliability.

