Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Metacognition01:26

Metacognition

1.1K
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
1.1K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

1.5K
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
1.5K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.2K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.2K
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

1.2K
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
1.2K
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring01:24

Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

381
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
381
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

260
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
260

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Too many eyes on the same prize? Why searching together but dividing attention shapes more effective collective foraging.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2026
Same author

Reimagining the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire as a single item screener for aphantasia.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

Complex Substrates and Bedding for Environmental Enhancement and Research: Or, the Nature of Primates.

American journal of primatology·2026
Same author

David A. Washburn (1961-2025).

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

Is it weird in here and does comparative cognition suffer from main-character syndrome?

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2026
Same author

Does new evidence affect chimpanzees' beliefs or expectations?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.7K

The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Ken Sayers1, Theodore A Evans1, Emilie Menzel1

  • 1Language Research Center, Georgia State University, 3401 Panthersville Rd., Decatur GA 30034, USA.

Behaviour
|February 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Rhesus monkeys exhibit metacognition, or uncertainty monitoring, by hesitating on difficult tasks. This behavior is not solely driven by food rewards, suggesting more complex cognitive processes in primates.

Keywords:
Macaca mulattaMorgan’s canonOld World monkeysassociative learningecologyevolutionmetacognitionself-reward behaviour

More Related Videos

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.7K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

23.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.7K
Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.7K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

23.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Animal Behavior
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Metacognition, the ability to monitor one's own mental states, is crucial for human intellect.
  • While some animal studies suggest uncertainty monitoring, interpretations often focus on basic reinforcement mechanisms tied to food rewards.
  • Few studies have detailed the nuanced trial-by-trial behaviors in such tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate metacognitive behavior in rhesus monkeys performing a discrimination task.
  • To analyze the ethological characteristics of uncertainty responses and incorrect responses.
  • To challenge models that attribute nonhuman metacognition solely to food-driven reinforcement.

Main Methods:

  • Ethological observation of a rhesus monkey during sparse-dense discrimination tasks.
  • Providing the option to escape trials by responding "uncertain".
  • Detailed analysis of response latencies, wavering, and food pellet consumption patterns.

Main Results:

  • Uncertainty responses occurred predominantly on high-difficulty trials.
  • These responses were characterized by increased latencies and significant wavering, unlike incorrect responses.
  • The monkey accumulated food pellets, consuming them across all trial outcomes, decoupling behavior from immediate reward.

Conclusions:

  • Rhesus monkey metacognition involves adaptive "hesitation" on challenging tasks, contradicting inflexible behavior models.
  • Behavior in metacognition tasks is not solely driven by food delivery or punishment avoidance.
  • Findings support more derived cognitive processing in primates, aligning with their evolutionary and neurological adaptations.