Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

06:08
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
1.9K
Poor standard mp-MRI and routine biopsy fail to precisely predict intraprostatic tumor localization
Andrea Billing1, Alexander Buchner2, Christian Stief2
1Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. andrea.billing@gmx.de.
World Journal of Urology
|February 25, 2016
Summary
Routinely performed multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) without PI-RADS assessment and transrectal biopsies show poor accuracy in localizing prostate cancer. Precise tumor detection for focal therapy requires PI-RADS evaluation by specialized radiologists.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background:
- Accurate prostate cancer localization is crucial for effective treatment planning.
- Focal therapy approaches necessitate precise identification of intraprostatic tumors.
- The role of non-PI-RADS assessed multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) in tumor localization requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the localization accuracy of preoperative mp-MRI when not evaluated using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) criteria.
- To compare the accuracy of non-PI-RADS mp-MRI with transrectal biopsies for prostate cancer localization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 106 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy with preoperative mp-MRI.
- Correlation of intraprostatic tumor locations identified by mp-MRI with subsequent biopsy and histopathology results.
- Evaluation of diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity) for tumor localization.
Main Results:
- Non-PI-RADS mp-MRI demonstrated low sensitivity (25-62%) and variable specificity (60-94%) for tumor localization.
- Neither higher magnetic field strength nor endorectal coil use improved accuracy.
- No statistically significant concordance was found in any sextant; accuracy was not significantly better than chance.
- Transrectal biopsies showed comparable sensitivity (52-63%) but lower specificity (46-80%).
Conclusions:
- Routinely performed non-PI-RADS mp-MRI is inadequate for accurate prostate cancer localization.
- Transrectal biopsy also exhibits limitations in precise tumor detection.
- Accurate intraprostatic tumor detection, essential for focal therapy, mandates PI-RADS assessment by genitourinary radiologists.
- Non-PI-RADS prostate MRIs are not clinically justified due to lack of accuracy, patient discomfort, and cost.

