Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

Standards of Care I

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparative real-world progression free survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients with bone metastases.

The oncologist·2026

Same author

A multicenter prospective study of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the PDCD1 (programmed cell death 1) gene in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026

Same author

Denosumab is associated with longer real-world progression-free survival in BRCA1/2-mutated HR+ /HER2 - breast cancer patients with bone metastases receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors: A multicenter Italian study.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026

Same author

Overcoming Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in Primary Cardiac Angiosarcoma.

JACC. Case reports·2026

Same author

Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, outcomes of patients with advanced disease treated with systemic agents: Retrospective study from the global pushing ultra-rare sarcomas towards hope (PUSH) consortium.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026

Same author

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for primary retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma: a Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) propensity score matched analysis.

EClinicalMedicine·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation.

Bruno Vincenzi¹, Andrea Napolitano¹, Daniele Santini¹

¹University Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Medical Oncology, Rome, Italy.

Journal of Bone Oncology

|February 25, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) is crucial for improving clinical practice. Correlating evidence levels and recommendation grades offers a simple method to assess the internal consistency of EBGs.

Keywords:

AGREE Bone metastasis EBG EBM Guideline

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Clinical Practice and Research Methodology

Background:

Modern healthcare relies heavily on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs).
Critical appraisal of EBGs is essential for enhancing clinical practice.
The consistency of EBGs directly impacts their clinical utility and reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a straightforward method for evaluating the internal consistency of evidence-based guidelines.
To demonstrate how correlating evidence levels and recommendation grades can serve as a tool for this evaluation.

Main Methods:

The study suggests correlating the established levels of evidence with the grades of recommendation within EBGs.
This correlation is presented as a method to visually inspect the internal consistency.

Main Results:

The proposed correlation method provides a quick and accessible way to assess the internal consistency of EBGs.
This approach can highlight potential discrepancies or inconsistencies within guideline recommendations.

Conclusions:

Correlating evidence levels and recommendation grades is a practical tool for evaluating EBG internal consistency.
This simple method aids in improving the quality and reliability of clinical practice guidelines.