Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Recruitment strategies and challenges in a large intervention trial: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial
Thomas M Ramsey1, Joni K Snyder2, Laura C Lovato3
1School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA tramsey@uabmc.edu.
Insights
The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) successfully enrolled over 9,300 hypertensive patients using diverse recruitment strategies. While exceeding minority enrollment, challenges remained in targeting specific subgroups, highlighting the need for adaptive recruitment tactics.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Cardiovascular Health
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) is a large, multicenter randomized clinical trial involving over 9,300 hypertensive participants aged 50 and older.
- The trial investigates the impact of intensive systolic blood pressure control (goal <120 mm Hg) versus standard control (goal <140 mm Hg) on cardiovascular events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To detail the recruitment strategies employed for the SPRINT trial cohort.
- To outline lessons learned during the recruitment of five targeted participant subgroups: those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, aged 75+, women, and minorities.
Main Methods:
- Recruitment spanned approximately 28 months (November 2010 - March 2013), overseen by five Clinical Center Networks.
- A multi-pronged approach included mass mailings, healthcare provider referrals, brochures, posters, and media advertisements.
- Strategies were adapted, including adding clinics and broadening inclusion criteria, to meet enrollment targets.
Main Results:
- The trial successfully enrolled 9,361 participants, exceeding the initial target of 9,250.
- Mass mailing initiated the most screens (33%), while referrals yielded the highest randomization rate (45%).
- Enrollment yields varied by subgroup: 77% for cardiovascular disease, 79% for chronic kidney disease, 70% for age ≥75, 55% for women, and 61% for minorities.
Conclusions:
- The SPRINT trial met its overall recruitment goal through diverse, localized strategies, exceeding targets for minority enrollment.
- Recruiting specific subgroups presented challenges, indicating a need for careful monitoring and potential adjustments to recruitment criteria or focus.
- Utilizing multiple recruitment sources concurrently proved beneficial, with mass mailing driving volume and referrals enhancing randomization efficiency.
Background:
The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 9361 participants with hypertension who are ≥50 years old. The trial is designed to evaluate the effect of intensive systolic blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure goal <120 mm Hg) compared to standard control (systolic blood pressure goal <140 mm Hg) on cardiovascular events using commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications and lifestyle modification.
Objective:
To describe the recruitment strategies and lessons learned during recruitment of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial cohort and five targeted participant subgroups: pre-existing cardiovascular disease, pre-existing chronic kidney disease, age ≥75 years, women, and minorities.
Methods:
In collaboration with the National Institutes of Health Project Office and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Coordinating Center, five Clinical Center Networks oversaw clinical site selection, recruitment, and trial activities. Recruitment began on 8 November 2010 and ended on 15 March 2013 (about 28 months). Various recruitment strategies were used, including mass mailing, brochures, referrals from healthcare providers or friends, posters, newspaper ads, radio ads, and electronic medical record searches.
Results:
Recruitment was scheduled to last 24 months to enroll a target of 9250 participants; in just over 28 months, the trial enrolled 9361 participants. The trial screened 14,692 volunteers, with 33% of initial screens originating from the use of mass mailing lists. Screening results show that participants also responded to recruitment efforts through referral by Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial staff, healthcare providers, or friends (45%); brochures or posters placed in clinic waiting areas (15%); and television, radio, newspaper, Internet ads, or toll-free numbers (8%). The overall recruitment yield (number randomized/number screened) was 64% (9361 randomized/14,692 screened), 77% for those with cardiovascular disease, 79% for those with chronic kidney disease, 70% for those aged ≥75 years, 55% for women, and 61% for minorities. As recruitment was observed to lag behind expectations, additional clinics were included and inclusion criteria were broadened, keeping event rates and trial power in mind. As overall recruitment improved, a greater focus on subgroup recruitment was implemented.
Conclusion:
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial met its overall projected recruitment goal using diverse, locally adapted enrollment strategies to specifically target persons with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, ≥75 years old, women, and minority subgroups. The trial exceeded its recruitment goal for minorities but found it a challenge to meet the competing demands of the targeted goals for recruiting into the remaining four subgroups. Important lessons include the imperative to monitor the recruitment process carefully, decide early to add new clinics or modify inclusion and exclusion criteria if recruitment lags, and consider limiting enrollment to subgroups only. We found benefit in using multiple recruitment sources simultaneously; mass mailing produced the largest number of participants, but referrals resulted in the greater randomization yield.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System

