Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Successful Aging Is Environmentally Friendly Aging: A Lifespan Perspective of Successful Aging in the Context of Climate Change.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Older adults are or older adults should be? Descriptive and prescriptive views of aging and their relation to self-reported behaviors in late adulthood.

Psychology and aging·2026
Same author

Did aging-related beliefs and behaviors change during the COVID-19 pandemic?

European journal of ageing·2026
Same author

Binding and retrieval of omitted responses in complex response sequences.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Concurrent associations between objective markers and subjective markers of aging with indicators of successful aging: An integrative approach.

European journal of ageing·2026
Same author

Negative Feedback Does Not Reverse Observationally Acquired Binding and Retrieval Effects: A Failed Replication.

Journal of cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K

Multi-level response coding in stimulus-response bindings: Irrelevant distractors retrieve both semantic and motor

Carina Giesen1, Klaus Rothermund1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|February 26, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Stimulus-response episodes retrieve both semantic and motor response codes from memory. This indicates multiple, independent levels of coding in human memory retrieval.

More Related Videos

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
06:57

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

11.0K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K
Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
06:57

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

11.0K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Stimulus-response (S-R) episodes form when responses occur near stimuli.
  • Stimulus repetition reactivates these episodes and associated responses from memory.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding how responses are coded (motor vs. semantic) within S-R episodes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature of response coding within transient S-R episodes.
  • To determine if retrieved responses are represented by specific motor commands or abstract/semantic meanings.
  • To differentiate between motor-specific and semantic-abstract response coding accounts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an approach/avoidance task to study S-R episodes.
  • Orthogonally manipulated semantic response meanings (towards/away) and motor response codes (push/pull).
  • Conducted 2 experiments to analyze stimulus repetition effects on response retrieval.

Main Results:

  • Stimulus repetitions successfully retrieved both semantic and motor code representations.
  • Evidence suggests multiple, independent levels of response coding within S-R episodes.
  • Findings indicate that response representations are not solely based on motor commands.

Conclusions:

  • Response representation in S-R episodes involves both semantic and motor coding.
  • These findings suggest parallel binding principles similar to stimulus integration.
  • Transient S-R episodes utilize flexible and multi-faceted response coding mechanisms.