Outcomes in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Left Main Stenting: The TAVR-LM Registry

Tarun Chakravarty1, Rahul Sharma1, Yigal Abramowitz2

  • 1Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.

Insights

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LM) disease is safe and feasible. Outcomes for TAVR plus LM PCI are comparable to TAVR alone in high-risk patients.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Structural Heart Disease

Background:

  • High-risk patients often have coexisting aortic stenosis and left main (LM) coronary artery disease.
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for LM disease and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are common in these patients.
  • Clinical outcomes of combined TAVR and LM PCI have not been previously reported.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR plus LM PCI.
  • To assess the safety and feasibility of this combined percutaneous approach.
  • To compare outcomes with TAVR alone.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective collection of clinical, echocardiographic, computed tomographic, and angiographic data from 204 patients.
  • 1:1 case-control matching created 128 pairs comparing TAVR with LM PCI to TAVR without LM revascularization.
  • Analysis focused on one-year mortality and outcomes based on LM protection status and PCI timing.

Main Results:

  • One-year mortality was similar between the TAVR plus LM PCI cohort and matched controls (9.4% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.83).
  • Mortality was comparable for unprotected versus protected LMs and for early versus late LM PCI.
  • Unplanned LM PCI due to TAVR complications increased 30-day and one-year mortality compared to planned PCI.

Conclusions:

  • TAVR plus LM PCI is safe and technically feasible, despite the proximity of the aortic annulus to the LM.
  • Short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes are comparable to TAVR alone.
  • This combined approach is a reasonable option for high-risk surgical patients.
Abstract