Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical analysis of population screening.

F E Alexander

    Medical Laboratory Sciences
    |July 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This review covers statistical methods for evaluating screening tests and programs. It examines screening for congenital abnormalities and chronic diseases together, finding similar analytical approaches.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Epidemiology of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Parts of England and Wales (1984-1988).

    Leukemia & lymphoma·2016
    Same author

    Yorkshire Case Control Study of Leukaemias and Lymphomas Parallel Multivariate Analyses of Seven Disease Categories.

    Leukemia & lymphoma·2016
    Same author

    Phyto-oestrogens and risk of prostate cancer in Scottish men.

    The British journal of nutrition·2007
    Same author

    Measles virus and classical Hodgkin lymphoma: no evidence for a direct association.

    International journal of cancer·2007
    Same author

    Phyto-oestrogen intake in Scottish men: use of serum to validate a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire in older men.

    European journal of clinical nutrition·2005
    Same author

    Day care in infancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: findings from UK case-control study.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2005
    Same journal

    Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE): a stimulus to wider research.

    Medical laboratory sciences·1992
    Same journal

    HBsAg vaccinaemia in a newborn.

    Medical laboratory sciences·1992
    Same journal

    Clinical waste disposal.

    Medical laboratory sciences·1992
    Same journal

    Stereomicroscopy in clinical microbiology.

    Medical laboratory sciences·1992
    Same journal

    Diagnostic dilemmas in acutely ill elderly people.

    Medical laboratory sciences·1992
    Same journal

    Principal alterations to drug kinetics and dynamics in the elderly.

    Medical laboratory sciences·1992
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Public Health
    • Epidemiology

    Background:

    • Screening tests and programs are crucial for early disease detection and prevention.
    • Evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions requires robust statistical methodologies.
    • Existing literature often separates the statistical evaluation of different screening types.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review and synthesize statistical techniques for the evaluation and monitoring of screening tests and programs.
    • To consider together the distinct approaches for screening congenital abnormalities and chronic diseases.
    • To establish a unified conceptual framework for analyzing diverse medical screening instances.

    Main Methods:

    • Comprehensive literature review of statistical methodologies applied to screening.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of statistical techniques used in screening for congenital abnormalities versus chronic diseases.
  • Conceptual synthesis to identify commonalities and differences in analytical approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified a range of statistical techniques applicable to screening evaluation.
    • Demonstrated conceptual similarities in the analysis of screening for congenital abnormalities and chronic diseases.
    • Provided a framework for applying statistical methods across various medical screening contexts.

    Conclusions:

    • Statistical evaluation methods for screening tests and programs can be unified under common principles.
    • The analytical approaches for different screening types share fundamental statistical underpinnings.
    • This review offers a consolidated perspective for the statistical monitoring of diverse health screening initiatives.