Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

14:53
In Situ Detection and Single Cell Quantification of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Nuclear Microprobe Analysis
Published on: February 3, 2018
7.6K
Dose metrics assessment for differently shaped and sized metal-based nanoparticles
Jing Hua1, Martina G Vijver2, Guangchao Chen2
1Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. hua@cml.leidenuniv.nl.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
|March 1, 2016
Summary
The best way to measure nanoparticle toxicity depends on the nanoparticle
Area of Science:
- Environmental toxicology
- Nanomaterial science
- Risk assessment
Background:
- Mean primary diameter is the standard metric for spherical nanoparticle toxicity.
- This metric is inadequate for nonspherical nanoparticles.
- A new metric is needed for accurate nanoparticle dose assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal dose metric for nanoparticle toxicity.
- To compare nanoparticle volume, surface area, and number as dose metrics.
- To evaluate dose metrics for various nanoparticle shapes and compositions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized mean surface area to volume ratio for spherical and nonspherical nanoparticles.
- Assessed toxicity in vivo (9 organisms) and in vitro (6 cell lines).
- Analyzed nanoparticle number versus effect concentration curves.
Main Results:
- Nanoparticle volume was the most appropriate dose metric for most organisms.
- Nanoparticle surface area was the best metric for silver nanoparticles in 3 organisms.
- The optimal dose metric varied based on organism and nanoparticle properties.
Conclusions:
- The choice of dose metric is critical for accurate nanoparticle risk assessment.
- Nanoparticle volume is often the most suitable metric, but exceptions exist.
- Future research should consider organism-specific and material-specific factors in dose metric selection.

