Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Representativeness Heuristic

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Studies on light catalysis oxidation degradation of Malachite Green by Photo-Fenton reagent].

Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu·2007

Same author

Alternative conformations of the archaeal Nop56/58-fibrillarin complex imply flexibility in box C/D RNPs.

Journal of molecular biology·2007

Same author

Validation of nonnested and real-time PCR for diagnosis of sheep-associated malignant catarrhal fever in clinical samples.

Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc·2007

Same author

Room temperature fabrication of porous ZnO photoelectrodes for flexible dye-sensitized solar cells.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2007

Same author

Influence of medication choice and comorbid diabetes: the cost of bipolar disorder in a privately insured US population.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2007

Same author

Mechanistic studies of the long chain acyl-CoA synthetase Faa1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2007

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Categorization Method Affects the Typicality Effect: ERP Evidence from a Category-Inference Task.

Xiaoxi Wang¹, Yun Tao², Tobias Tempel³

¹School of Psychology, Southwest University Chongqing, China.

Frontiers in Psychology

|March 1, 2016

Summary

The typicality effect in categorization is more pronounced in inclusion tasks than exclusion tasks. This study used behavioral and electrophysiological measures to show how categorization method impacts typicality judgments.

Keywords:

N2 N400 P2 categorization method category inference event-related potentials (ERPs)typicality effect

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Linguistics

Background:

The typicality effect describes easier judgments for typical category members versus atypical ones.
Previous research primarily used inclusion tasks, neglecting the role of exclusion in categorization.
Understanding both inclusion and exclusion is crucial for a complete picture of categorization processes.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how categorization method (inclusion vs. exclusion) influences the typicality effect.
To examine behavioral and electrophysiological responses to typical, atypical, and non-members across different tasks.
To determine if inclusion or exclusion tasks are more sensitive to category typicality.

Main Methods:

Thirty-two participants were divided into inclusion and exclusion groups.
Participants judged word stimuli based on category membership or non-membership.
Behavioral data (accuracy, response time) and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded.

Main Results:

Accuracy did not differ between groups, but typical items were responded to faster than atypical items, especially in the inclusion group.
Electrophysiological data revealed significant interactions between item type and group in P2, N2, and N400 ERP components.
A typicality effect was observed in the inclusion group during P2 and N400, and in the exclusion group during N2.

Conclusions:

Inclusion judgment tasks are more sensitive to category typicality than exclusion tasks.
Behavioral and electrophysiological findings suggest distinct neural processing for inclusion and exclusion categorization.
This research highlights the importance of considering the task method when studying categorization and the typicality effect.