Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2026

Methylation Specific Multiplex Droplet PCR using Polymer Droplet Generator Device for Hematological Diagnostics
Published on: June 29, 2020
Allergic Reactions With Intravenous Compared With Intramuscular Pegaspargase in Children With High-risk Acute
Tamara MacDonald1, Ketan Kulkarni, Mark Bernstein
1*Department of Pharmacy ‡Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, IWK Health Centre †Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Insights
Intravenous pegaspargase in high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients may increase allergic reactions. Switching to intramuscular erwinia asparaginase, though costly, might be reconsidered for safety.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Hematology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Intravenous (IV) pegaspargase is used for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
- Concerns exist regarding increased allergic reactions with IV pegaspargase, potentially necessitating a switch to intramuscular (IM) erwinia asparaginase.
- High-risk (HR)-ALL patients may be particularly susceptible to these reactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incidence of allergic reactions associated with IV versus IM pegaspargase in pediatric ALL patients.
- To determine if specific patient subgroups, such as HR-ALL, experience a higher risk of reactions.
- To inform decisions regarding the optimal administration route of pegaspargase in ALL treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 128 pediatric patients with ALL.
- Comparison of allergic reaction rates between patients receiving IV pegaspargase and IM erwinia asparaginase.
- Subgroup analysis focusing on high-risk (HR)-ALL patients.
Main Results:
- Allergic reactions occurred in 14% of patients receiving IV pegaspargase compared to 3% receiving IM erwinia asparaginase (P=0.029).
- The increased risk of reactions was significantly associated with HR-ALL patients (P<0.01).
- The study identified a higher incidence of allergic reactions with IV pegaspargase, especially in high-risk ALL patients.
Conclusions:
- The IV route of pegaspargase administration is linked to a higher risk of allergic reactions in pediatric ALL patients, particularly those with high-risk disease.
- The potential for decreased efficacy, reduced quality of life, and increased costs associated with switching to IM erwinia asparaginase warrants careful consideration.
- Revisiting the use of IV pegaspargase in HR-ALL patients may be necessary to balance efficacy, safety, and treatment burden.
Abstract:
Intravenous (IV) administration of pegaspargase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be associated with an increased risk of allergic reactions, and thus the need for more costly intramuscular (IM) erwinia asparaginase. In 128 patients allergic reactions were documented in 3% and 14% of those who received IM and IV pegaspargase, respectively (P=0.029). These reactions were primarily contributed to by high risk (HR)-ALL patients (P<0.01). The possible decreased efficacy and quality of life and the substantial costs entailed by switching from IV pegaspargase to IM erwinia should prompt reconsideration of the IV administration route for pegaspargase in HR-ALL patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Routes of Drug Administration: Parenteral
The intravenous route (IV) of drug administration can be further categorized into two types. The bolus injection administers the entire dose rapidly, while an intravenous infusion slowly delivers smaller doses steadily.
The IV route is often...
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis

