Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

4.7K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.7K
Proteomics01:33

Proteomics

10.1K
A proteome is the entire set of proteins that a cell type produces. We can study proteomes using the knowledge of genomes because genes code for mRNAs, and the mRNAs encode proteins. Although mRNA analysis is a step in the right direction, not all mRNAs are translated into proteins.
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term...
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The PRECISE European initiative for cancer-vulnerability mapping and prediction.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Evolving patterns of co-mutations from tumor initiation to metastatic progression.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Cathepsin S regulates germinal center reactions and anti-tumor humoral responses.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2026
Same author

TADShop: systematic benchmarking and identification of topologically associating domains.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

An appendiceal cancer organoid biobank identifies phenotypic evolution and druggable dependencies of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Developmental cell·2026
Same author

HaploC-tools reveal haplotype-specific chromosome conformation and chromatin states.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics
07:28

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics

Published on: October 19, 2021

3.7K

A Multi-Method Approach for Proteomic Network Inference in 11 Human Cancers.

Yasin Şenbabaoğlu1, Selçuk Onur Sümer1, Francisco Sánchez-Vega1

  • 1Computational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology
|March 2, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated 13 network inference methods using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) proteomic data. Six methods consistently performed well, revealing key cancer biological processes and potential technical biases in protein expression analysis.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors
08:08

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors

Published on: February 27, 2015

17.1K
Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics
07:28

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics

Published on: October 19, 2021

3.7K
Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors
08:08

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors

Published on: February 27, 2015

17.1K
Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Cancer Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Protein expression is crucial for cancer hallmarks.
  • The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) collected proteomic data from 3,467 samples across 11 tumor types using reverse phase protein array (RPPA) technology.
  • This data enables the study of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks in cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of 13 network inference methods for retrieving known interactions from RPPA data.
  • To identify robust methods for constructing pan-cancer protein interaction networks.
  • To explore commonalities and differences in proteomic networks across tumor types.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 13 network inference algorithms using RPPA data from TCGA.
  • Compared method performance against curated Pathway Commons interactions.
  • Developed a consensus network using high-performing methods.
  • Identified densely connected modules within the consensus network.

Main Results:

  • No single method excelled across all tumor types, but six methods consistently ranked highly.
  • A consensus network revealed four robust modules.
  • Analysis identified key pan-cancer biological processes including signal transduction, immune signaling, cell cycle, metabolism, and DNA repair.
  • Potential antibody-related technical biases were also suggested.

Conclusions:

  • RPPA technology is valuable for studying cancer proteomic networks.
  • A combination of network inference methods provides a robust approach to analyzing complex proteomic data.
  • The identified network modules offer insights into cancer biology and potential tumor-specific processes.