Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
CENTRE: creating psychological safety in groups
Douglas Cave1,2, Hilary Pearson1,2, Paul Whitehead1,2
1Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Background:
Ten years of clinical and teaching experience has shown us that when teams or groups come together, it is often for a commonly understood and agreed upon purpose, but often without an agreed upon process of how to work together. Explicit guidelines in this regard promote psychological safety.
Context:
This article presents a method of developing agreements that can be used in a variety of settings to create psychological safety and cohesion. In our experience, agreements about how people join together seem to be developed implicitly. Assumption-based and implicit agreements can engender friction because unspoken or unclear agreements are not easily addressed because they are not universally understood.
Innovation:
A literature review helped to identify key factors contributing to psychological safety and led to creating 'CENTRE' to help clinical teams apply these factors. We are now starting to evaluate its impact. We believe a tool such as CENTRE facilitates the development of explicitly articulated group formation and maintenance guidelines, thus reducing the risk of interpersonal discord.
Implications:
We propose that a tool such as CENTRE be considered for a range of group situations, including clinical family meetings, teaching, professional teams and Balint-type groups. We are currently using this approach in clinical, academic and other professional environments. Findings from a survey of groups where CENTRE was used suggested that participants find the process useful. We believe a tool such as CENTRE can be used to help address relational issues, promote psychological safety, inclusion and trust among members, and reduce the risk of undeclared expectations and assumptions from dictating how groups function. Assumption-based and implicit agreements can engender friction because unspoken or unclear agreements are not easily addressed.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Groupthink
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Group Therapy
Impact of Groups on Groups
In- and Out-Groups