Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
Published on: August 2, 2019
Can quantum transition state theory be defined as an exact t = 0+ limit?
Seogjoo Jang1, Gregory A Voth2
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Queens College, City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Queens, New York 11367, USA and Ph.D. Programs in Chemistry and Physics and Initiative for the Theoretical Sciences, Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA.
This study challenges the definition of quantum transition state theory (QTST), arguing that a proposed QTST is not equivalent to ring polymer molecular dynamics (RPMD) TST. The research clarifies that the correct quantum rate expression, derived from linear response theory, vanishes in the exact quantum limit.
Area of Science:
- Chemical Physics
- Quantum Mechanics
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- Classical transition state theory (TST) defines reaction rates as a t → 0+ limit of flux-side time correlation functions.
- Quantum mechanics' noncommutativity of population and flux measurements prevents direct extension of TST to the quantum regime.
- Quantum TST (QTST) is broadly defined as any quantum rate theory matching TST in the classical limit, with no unique QTST universally accepted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To question and clarify assumptions in a recent proposal for a unique QTST by Hele and Althorpe (HA).
- To investigate the relationship between HA's proposed QTST, ring polymer molecular dynamics TST (RPMD-TST), and established quantum rate theories.
- To formulate an alternative quantum rate expression based on linear response theory and real-time dynamics of imaginary-time path integrals.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the time correlation function used by HA, assessing its relation to kinetic rate constants via linear response theory.
- Theoretical examination of a key step in HA's proof to verify its reliance on exact quantum mechanical identities.
- Formulation of a new quantum rate expression using linear response theory and a formalism for real-time dynamics of imaginary-time path integrals.
Main Results:
- The time correlation function used by HA is not directly related to the kinetic rate constant through linear response theory.
- A key step in HA's proof was found to be questionable, leading to a corrected t → 0+ limit for their QTST.
- The corrected limit of HA's QTST aligns with the path integral quantum transition state theory rate expression using a centroid dividing surface, not RPMD-TST.
- The newly formulated quantum rate expression's t → 0+ limit vanishes in the exact quantum limit.
Conclusions:
- The proposed QTST by Hele and Althorpe is not equivalent to RPMD-TST and requires correction.
- The established path integral quantum transition state theory with a centroid dividing surface provides a more accurate quantum rate expression in this context.
- A novel quantum rate expression derived from linear response theory and path integral dynamics shows a vanishing rate in the exact quantum limit, highlighting fundamental differences in quantum rate theories.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
The Entropy as a State Function
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States
The Uncertainty Principle
Limits of the First Law of Thermodynamics
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

