An optimal stratified Simon two-stage design
Deepak Parashar1, Jack Bowden2, Colin Starr2
1Statistics and Epidemiology Unit, and Cancer Research Centre, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Abstract:
In Phase II oncology trials, therapies are increasingly being evaluated for their effectiveness in specific populations of interest. Such targeted trials require designs that allow for stratification based on the participants' molecular characterisation. A targeted design proposed by Jones and Holmgren (JH) Jones CL, Holmgren E: 'An adaptive Simon two-stage design for phase 2 studies of targeted therapies', Contemporary Clinical Trials 28 (2007) 654-661.determines whether a drug only has activity in a disease sub-population or in the wider disease population. Their adaptive design uses results from a single interim analysis to decide whether to enrich the study population with a subgroup or not; it is based on two parallel Simon two-stage designs. We study the JH design in detail and extend it by providing a few alternative ways to control the familywise error rate, in the weak sense as well as the strong sense. We also introduce a novel optimal design by minimising the expected sample size. Our extended design contributes to the much needed framework for conducting Phase II trials in stratified medicine. © 2016 The Authors Pharmaceutical Statistics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Insights
This study enhances adaptive Phase II oncology trial designs for targeted therapies. New methods improve population enrichment strategies and control error rates, optimizing drug evaluation in specific patient subgroups.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
- Oncology
Background:
- Phase II oncology trials increasingly evaluate targeted therapies in specific populations.
- Stratification based on molecular characteristics is crucial for these targeted trials.
- Existing adaptive designs need refinement for personalized medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and extend the Jones and Holmgren (JH) adaptive two-stage design for Phase II oncology trials.
- To introduce novel methods for controlling the familywise error rate (FWER) in stratified trials.
- To develop an optimal design minimizing expected sample size in targeted therapy evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Detailed study of the JH adaptive design, which uses interim analysis for population enrichment.
- Development of alternative FWER control methods (strong and weak sense).
- Introduction of a novel optimal design focused on minimizing expected sample size.
Main Results:
- The JH design allows adaptive enrichment of Phase II trial populations based on molecular characteristics.
- Extended methods provide robust control over familywise error rates in stratified designs.
- A new optimal design is proposed, offering efficiency gains through minimized sample size.
Conclusions:
- The enhanced JH design provides a valuable framework for Phase II trials in stratified medicine.
- The proposed methods improve the statistical rigor and efficiency of evaluating targeted oncology therapies.
- This work supports the development of personalized medicine through adaptive trial designs.
Related Concept Videos
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Methods of Medium Optimization
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks


