Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

16.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
16.0K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

15.4K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
15.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

15
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
15
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

380
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
380
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

556
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
556

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic and epidemiological evidence linking respiratory and musculoskeletal diseases: shared risk factors and intervention windows.

Respiratory research·2026
Same author

A curated dataset of 3,477 high-resolution Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) leaf images for automated detection of Black Rot, Esca, and Leaf Blight diseases.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

A multi-agent large language model framework for intelligent vendor evaluation and risk-aware procurement decisions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Bioinformatics analysis of TRPV1 expression and its role in hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis.

Discover oncology·2026
Same author

Hybrid Aquila optimizer-Harris Hawks optimization for CNN hyperparameter tuning in brain tumor classification.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Correlation based feature importance analysis for improving machine learning stability predictions in hybrid PV systems.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

6.2K

An optimal stratified Simon two-stage design.

Deepak Parashar1, Jack Bowden2, Colin Starr2

  • 1Statistics and Epidemiology Unit, and Cancer Research Centre, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Pharmaceutical Statistics
|March 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study enhances adaptive Phase II oncology trial designs for targeted therapies. New methods improve population enrichment strategies and control error rates, optimizing drug evaluation in specific patient subgroups.

Keywords:
Adaptive EnrichmentPhase II OncologyStratified Design

More Related Videos

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.7K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

6.2K
Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.7K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.2K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Phase II oncology trials increasingly evaluate targeted therapies in specific populations.
  • Stratification based on molecular characteristics is crucial for these targeted trials.
  • Existing adaptive designs need refinement for personalized medicine.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze and extend the Jones and Holmgren (JH) adaptive two-stage design for Phase II oncology trials.
  • To introduce novel methods for controlling the familywise error rate (FWER) in stratified trials.
  • To develop an optimal design minimizing expected sample size in targeted therapy evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed study of the JH adaptive design, which uses interim analysis for population enrichment.
  • Development of alternative FWER control methods (strong and weak sense).
  • Introduction of a novel optimal design focused on minimizing expected sample size.

Main Results:

  • The JH design allows adaptive enrichment of Phase II trial populations based on molecular characteristics.
  • Extended methods provide robust control over familywise error rates in stratified designs.
  • A new optimal design is proposed, offering efficiency gains through minimized sample size.

Conclusions:

  • The enhanced JH design provides a valuable framework for Phase II trials in stratified medicine.
  • The proposed methods improve the statistical rigor and efficiency of evaluating targeted oncology therapies.
  • This work supports the development of personalized medicine through adaptive trial designs.