Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.2K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.5K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

13.0K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.0K
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

6.9K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
6.9K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.4K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pancreatitis associated with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine use in Crohn's disease: a systematic review.

Frontline gastroenterology·2022
Same author

Gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19 in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontline gastroenterology·2021
Same author

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of tranexamic acid in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2020
Same author

Clinical usefulness of the faecal calprotectin test in suspected paediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2018
Same author

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with prior cryptogenic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Two-vessel Occlusion Mouse Model of Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion
07:34

Two-vessel Occlusion Mouse Model of Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion

Published on: March 1, 2019

12.5K

Understanding type I and type II errors, statistical power and sample size.

Anthony K Akobeng1,2

  • 1Sidra Medical and Research Centre, Doha, Qatar.

Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)
|March 4, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Random errors in clinical trials, including type I and type II errors, can affect results. Ensuring an adequate sample size is crucial for minimizing these errors and strengthening study validity.

Keywords:
PowerSample sizeType I errorType II error

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
09:11

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability

Published on: February 23, 2016

23.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Two-vessel Occlusion Mouse Model of Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion
07:34

Two-vessel Occlusion Mouse Model of Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion

Published on: March 1, 2019

12.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
09:11

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability

Published on: February 23, 2016

23.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Clinical trial results are susceptible to random error due to data variability.
  • Random error can arise purely by chance, impacting study outcomes.
  • Understanding and mitigating random error is essential for reliable research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain type I and type II errors in statistical analysis.
  • To discuss the concepts of statistical power and sample size estimation.
  • To highlight methods for minimizing random error in clinical research.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual explanation of type I and type II errors.
  • Discussion of statistical power and its relation to error.
  • Exploration of sample size estimation techniques.

Main Results:

  • Type I error (false positive) and type II error (false negative) are defined.
  • Statistical power is presented as the probability of detecting a true effect.
  • The relationship between sample size, statistical power, and error rates is examined.

Conclusions:

  • Minimizing random error is critical for the integrity of clinical trial findings.
  • Adequate sample size is the most effective strategy to reduce random error.
  • Recruiting a sufficient number of participants is paramount for robust study results.