Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Advanced Cardiac Rhythm Management by Applying Optogenetic Multi-Site Photostimulation in Murine Hearts
Published on: August 26, 2021
The effects of second and third phase duration on defibrillation efficacy of triphasic rectangle waveforms
Ce Tang1, Pei Wang1, Yushun Gong1
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Triphasic waveforms with shorter third phase durations significantly improve ventricular defibrillation success compared to biphasic waveforms. Optimizing phase durations is key for effective triphasic waveform defibrillation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Research
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Biphasic waveforms are more effective than monophasic waveforms for terminating ventricular fibrillation (VF).
- The superiority of triphasic waveforms over biphasic waveforms for VF termination remains debated.
- This study investigates triphasic rectangle waveform efficacy by analyzing second and third phase durations in a rabbit VF model.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of second and third phase durations of triphasic rectangle waveforms on defibrillation efficacy.
- To compare the defibrillation threshold (DFT) of optimized triphasic waveforms against standard biphasic waveforms.
- To determine optimal parameters for triphasic waveform design in ventricular defibrillation.
Main Methods:
- Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 20 New Zealand rabbits and untreated for 30 seconds.
- Defibrillation was attempted using one of seven waveforms: six triphasic rectangle waveforms and one biphasic rectangle waveform.
- A 5-step up-and-down protocol determined the defibrillation threshold (DFT), with procedures repeated after a 5-minute interval.
Main Results:
- Two triphasic waveforms with identical first and second phase durations but shorter third phase durations showed significantly lower DFT energy compared to biphasic waveforms (0.57±0.18J and 0.60±0.18J vs. 0.80±0.28J).
- No significant difference in DFT energy was found between triphasic waveforms with identical phase durations but varying voltages.
- The results indicate that phase duration, particularly the third phase, is critical for triphasic waveform performance.
Conclusions:
- Phase durations are the primary determinant of defibrillation success for triphasic rectangle waveforms.
- Optimal triphasic rectangle waveforms, characterized by identical first and second phase durations and a shorter third phase, outperform biphasic waveforms in ventricular defibrillation.
- These findings suggest that tailored triphasic waveforms offer enhanced efficacy for treating ventricular fibrillation.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias

