Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

14:59
Neuronavigation and Laparoscopy Guided Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion for the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Published on: October 14, 2022
11.5K
CSF tap test - Obsolete or appropriate test for predicting shunt responsiveness? A systemic review
Mario Mihalj1, Krešimir Dolić2, Krešimir Kolić2
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Split, Croatia.
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
|March 6, 2016
Summary
The cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF-TT) shows high reliability for identifying patients who will benefit from shunt surgery for normal pressure hydrocephalus. However, a negative CSF-TT result does not reliably exclude patients from surgery.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Neurology
- Diagnostic Testing
Background:
- Accurate diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and identification of patients who will benefit from shunt surgery remain challenging.
- The cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF-TT) is utilized to enhance predictive value in selecting NPH patients for shunting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the literature evaluating the effect of the CSF-TT on main symptom outcomes.
- To assess the validity parameters of the CSF-TT in screening patients suitable for shunting.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted in February 2015.
- Keywords included: normal pressure hydrocephalus, idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus, shunt operation, CSF tap test, predictive value, and validity.
- Eight articles directly addressing the topic were retrieved.
Main Results:
- The CSF-TT demonstrated a high positive predictive value (92%) but a low negative predictive value (37%).
- Specificity was high (75%), while sensitivity was average (58%).
- The overall accuracy of the CSF-TT was 62%.
Conclusions:
- The systematic review did not yield unambiguous validity for the CSF-TT in screening NPH patients for shunting.
- A positive CSF-TT response is highly reliable for patient inclusion in shunting.
- A negative CSF-TT response is not reliably indicative of ineligibility for shunting, necessitating further research.

