Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Balancing scalpel and family life: Gender gaps in a European cohort of plastic surgeons.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Beyond volume reduction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of microsurgical treatment of lymphedema.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2025
Same author

German translation and linguistic validation of the HAND-Q.

Hand surgery & rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Measuring quality of care in autologous breast reconstruction: a Delphi consensus.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2023
Same author

Intramedullary screw fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures - A systematic review of 837 patients.

Hand surgery & rehabilitation·2021
Same author

Targeted therapies and checkpoint inhibitors in sarcoma.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration
08:17

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration

Published on: February 27, 2018

17.2K

Extending the limits of reconstructive microsurgery in elderly patients.

H J Klein1, N Fuchs1, T Mehra2

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery : JPRAS
|March 8, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Microsurgical free tissue transfer is safe and effective for very old patients (≥78 years), offering functional restoration when alternatives are limited. Careful patient selection and perioperative care can minimize complications in this aging population.

Keywords:
ASAComplicationsFree flapMortalityReconstructive microsurgeryRisk

More Related Videos

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
09:14

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Published on: December 30, 2025

193
Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer
19:53

Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer

Published on: March 1, 2015

106.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration
08:17

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration

Published on: February 27, 2018

17.2K
Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
09:14

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Published on: December 30, 2025

193
Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer
19:53

Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer

Published on: March 1, 2015

106.6K

Area of Science:

  • Microsurgery
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Geriatric Medicine

Background:

  • Population aging impacts industrialized nations, challenging traditional views on surgical feasibility for older adults.
  • Microsurgical procedures, once thought limited to younger patients, are now recognized as beneficial for the elderly.
  • Age-related comorbidities were previously a concern for microsurgical procedures due to duration and vascular risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of microsurgical free tissue transfer in patients aged 78 years and older.
  • To analyze patient characteristics, flap survival rates, and postoperative complications in a geriatric cohort undergoing free flaps.
  • To determine the impact of age and comorbidities on outcomes of microsurgical procedures in elderly patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective investigation of a patient cohort (n=25, 27 free flaps) with a minimum age of 78 years.
  • Analysis of patient demographics, flap survival, and surgical/medical complications post-procedure.
  • Assessment of factors including age, operation time, and ASA score in relation to complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Median patient age was 81 years; most defects were in the head and neck region.
  • Flap failure occurred in 11% of cases; mortality rate was 4%.
  • Postoperative surgical complications were observed in 41%, and medical complications in 70%, with no significant correlation to age, operating time, or ASA status.

Conclusions:

  • Free tissue transfer is a justifiable curative option for very old patients needing structural and functional restoration, especially when alternatives are limited.
  • The procedure aims to maximize patient independence and early ambulation, contributing to quality of life in aging populations.
  • Optimizing patient selection and perioperative management is crucial for mitigating complication risks in elderly patients undergoing free tissue transfer.