Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analytical calculation of the dose to a spherical target by an ion at almost all impact parameters, and calculation of the energy deposition spectra.

Life sciences in space research·2026
Same author

Editorial: 3<sup>rd</sup> international workshop on microdosimetry for particle therapy: Bridging physics and biology.

Precision radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Proton-specific dose and radiation quality constraints to reduce acute oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Utilizing the Life Span Study data in NASA astronaut cancer risk assessment.

Carcinogenesis·2025
Same author

Microdosimetry investigation of target fragments in proton therapy, assessing the impact of the detector type.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Immune Stromal Components Impede Biological Effectiveness of Carbon Ion Therapy in a Preclinical Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Molecular cancer therapeutics·2025
Same journal

Hybrid active-passive Galactic Cosmic Ray simulator: In-silico design and optimization.

Life sciences in space research·2026
Same journal

Hybrid active-passive galactic cosmic ray simulator: Experimental implementation and microdosimetric characterization.

Life sciences in space research·2026
Same journal

An ensemble dose-response model for monoenergetic ions and doses relevant for space radiation carcinogenesis.

Life sciences in space research·2026
Same journal

Dose and LET-dependence of gastric cancer risk in Apc<sup>1638N/+</sup> mice exposed to space-relevant radiation types.

Life sciences in space research·2026
Same journal

The history and perspective on quality factors proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).

Life sciences in space research·2026
Same journal

DNA decompaction enhances the formation of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks and chromosome aberrations.

Life sciences in space research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Sample Preparation and Experimental Design for In Situ Multi-Beam Transmission Electron Microscopy Irradiation Experiments
08:31

Sample Preparation and Experimental Design for In Situ Multi-Beam Transmission Electron Microscopy Irradiation Experiments

Published on: June 27, 2022

2.4K

Reference field specification and preliminary beam selection strategy for accelerator-based GCR simulation.

Tony C Slaba1, Steve R Blattnig1, John W Norbury1

  • 1NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA.

Life Sciences in Space Research
|March 8, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simulating deep space radiation in the lab is challenging due to energy limits. Researchers developed a beam selection strategy for the galactic cosmic ray (GCR) simulator, considering shielding and solar activity.

Keywords:
Astronaut riskGalactic cosmic raysRadiobiologySpace radiation

More Related Videos

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
14:11

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Published on: March 29, 2016

27.8K
Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples
10:12

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Sample Preparation and Experimental Design for In Situ Multi-Beam Transmission Electron Microscopy Irradiation Experiments
08:31

Sample Preparation and Experimental Design for In Situ Multi-Beam Transmission Electron Microscopy Irradiation Experiments

Published on: June 27, 2022

2.4K
Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
14:11

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Published on: March 29, 2016

27.8K
Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples
10:12

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Space physics and radiation biology.
  • Laboratory simulation of space environments.

Background:

  • Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) pose significant risks in deep space.
  • Accurate simulation of GCRs is crucial for biological research and mission planning.
  • The NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) aims to replicate the GCR environment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze and improve methods for simulating the GCR environment in a laboratory setting.
  • To address challenges in simulating both free space and shielded GCR fields.
  • To develop a beam selection strategy for the NSRL GCR simulator.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of direct free space GCR field simulation versus induced tissue field simulation behind shielding.
  • Analysis of variations in the induced tissue field due to shielding and solar activity.
  • Development of a preliminary beam selection methodology for the GCR simulator.

Main Results:

  • Upper energy constraints at NSRL limit direct simulation of the free space GCR field.
  • Variations in the induced tissue field are likely within the uncertainty of current simulation methods.
  • A single reference field for deep space missions was identified.
  • A beam selection approach was proposed, adaptable to facility and biological constraints.

Conclusions:

  • Direct simulation of the external GCR field is constrained by facility energy limitations.
  • Current simulation methods can account for variations in shielded fields within existing uncertainties.
  • The proposed beam selection strategy offers a flexible approach for GCR simulation at NSRL.