Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

9.8K

Robot-assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy for Simple Prostatectomy: Multicenter Comparative Outcomes.

Nicola Pavan1, Homayoun Zargar2, Rafael Sanchez-Salas3

  • 1Urology Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH; Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Italy.

Urology
|March 8, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laparoscopy: is there still a place in 2026?

Minerva urology and nephrology·2026
Same author

The tack technique for robotic ventral mesh rectopexy: An useful, safe and effective trick using the Hugo RAS™ system.

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Early hemodynamic changes following endoscopic sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease assessed by transperineal ultrasound and their relationship with clinical outcomes.

International journal of colorectal disease·2026
Same author

Evaluating the effectiveness of oral phlebotonics for the conservative management of hemorrhoidal disease: insights from the VIVI2022/01/VIVALDI study.

Frontiers in surgery·2026
Same author

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, mucopexy, and hybrid combination for grade III hemorrhoids: a large retrospective cohort study.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
Same author

The Predictive Value of Computed Tomography and HA3D Nephrometry Scores for Complications After Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Implications of Alpha-gal Syndrome in Urologic Management.

Urology·2026
Same journal

"Editorial Comment on "Vaginal Estrogen Prescription is Associated with Reduced Rates of Serious Adverse Outcomes in Women of All Age Groups With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: An Epic Cosmos Database Analysis".

Urology·2026
Same journal

The True Oral History of Buccal Mucosal Grafts for Male Urethral Stricture Repair.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Preventing Postpartum Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Clinical Evidence and Policy Gaps in U.S. Coverage of Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "Through the Eyes of the Applicant: A Qualitative Study of the Urology Residency Match".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

Urology·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) are safe and effective treatments for enlarged prostates. Both procedures offer significant improvements in patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition causing bladder outlet obstruction.
  • Simple prostatectomy is a surgical option for BPH, with minimally invasive approaches gaining popularity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness and outcomes of laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) versus robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of consecutive LSP and RASP cases (2003-2014) from three institutions.
  • Paired analysis of functional and surgical outcomes.
  • Multivariate analysis to identify predictors of a favorable "trifecta" outcome.

Main Results:

  • 319 patients underwent minimally invasive simple prostatectomy.

More Related Videos

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
14:45

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

15.8K
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

9.8K
Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
14:45

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

15.8K
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

6.9K
  • Prostate volume was larger in the RASP group.
  • No significant differences in catheterization time or hospital stay.
  • Higher overall postoperative complications in RASP group, but no difference in major complications.
  • Both LSP and RASP showed significant subjective and objective improvements.
  • Age and BMI were predictors of favorable trifecta outcome.

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) are safe and effective minimally invasive treatments.
    • Both techniques provide significant improvements for patients with bladder outlet obstruction due to large prostates.