Divorcing the puzzles: When group identities foster in-group cooperation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Daniel Seewald1, Stefanie Hechler1, Thomas Kessler1
1Department of Social Psychology,Friedrich Schiller University,07743 Jena,Germany.daniel.seewald@uni-jena.destefanie.hechler@uni-jena.dethomas.kessler@uni-jena.dehttp://www.sozialpsychologie.uni-jena.de/?lang=en.
Abstract:
We argue that general social psychological mechanisms (e.g., common group identity) can account for prosocial behavior and cooperative norms without the need for punishing Big Gods. Moreover, prosocial religions often do not prevent conflict within their religious groups. Hence, we doubt whether Big Gods and prosocial religions are more effective than alternative identities in enhancing high-level cooperation.
More Related Videos
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
Robbers Cave
Impact of Groups on Groups
Impact of Groups on Individuals
Social Identity
Impact of Individuals on a Group