Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic analysis of protein stability and function.

A A Pakula1, R T Sauer

  • 1Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125.

Annual Review of Genetics
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure and dynamics of the tetrameric mnt repressor and a model for its DNA complex.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2012
Same author

NMR structure determination of the tetramerization domain of the Mnt repressor: An asymmetric alpha-helical assembly in slow exchange.

Journal of biomolecular NMR·2010
Same author

Protein-Protein Interactions in DNA Recognition: H-NMR Studies of Lambda cI Repressors Genetically Altered by Site-Directed Mutagenesis.

Biophysical journal·2009
Same author

Assignments of the 1H,13C, and 15N resonances of the substrate-binding SSD domain from Lon protease.

Journal of biomolecular NMR·2002
Same author

Simultaneous and functional binding of SmpB and EF-Tu-TP to the alanyl acceptor arm of tmRNA.

Journal of molecular biology·2001
Same author

Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2001
Same journal

Genomic Imprinting: Common Threads Uniting Diverse Biological Systems.

Annual review of genetics·2026
Same journal

Properties and Prospects of B Chromosomes.

Annual review of genetics·2026
Same journal

Lessons From Yeast: Mechanisms of Telomere Length Regulation.

Annual review of genetics·2026
Same journal

Mechanisms and Evolutionary Advantages of Unlimited Reproductive Lifespans in Naked Mole-Rat Queens.

Annual review of genetics·2026
Same journal

Impact of Small RNA Sponges on Regulatory RNA Networks in Bacteria.

Annual review of genetics·2025
Same journal

Context Specificity of MAP3K DLK Signaling in the Nervous System: Insights from Genetics and Genomics.

Annual review of genetics·2025
See all related articles

Predicting amino acid substitution effects on protein function is complex. While some changes are tolerated, others cause severe issues, especially in key protein regions.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Protein Science

Background:

  • Amino acid substitutions exhibit variable impacts on protein stability and activity.
  • Conservative substitutions can sometimes lead to significant loss of function, while nonconservative ones may be tolerated.
  • Predicting these effects solely from sequence information is challenging due to context-dependent outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the variability in the importance of individual amino acids in protein sequences.
  • To understand the factors influencing the phenotypic effects of amino acid substitutions.
  • To provide generalizable rules for predicting destabilizing mutations based on protein structure.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing data on amino acid substitutions and their effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Generalization of observations into predictive rules based on protein structural features.
  • Comparison of effects of conservative versus nonconservative substitutions.

    • Main Results:

    • Substitutions introducing polar groups or large cavities into the hydrophobic core are highly destabilizing.
    • Disruptions in hydrogen bonding or electrostatic interactions can significantly affect stability.
    • Glycine substitutions in turns and proline incorporation into alpha-helices are common destabilizing events.
    • Most solvent-exposed residues tolerate substitutions without significant impact on stability.

    Conclusions:

    • Protein structure knowledge aids in predicting destabilizing substitutions.
    • General rules can be formulated for predicting mutation effects, particularly for core residues.
    • Proteins generally tolerate substitutions without major structural changes, allowing phenotype interpretation based on wild-type structure.