Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-diagnostic time in digital pathology: An empirical study over 10 years.

Journal of pathology informatics·2024
Same author

Digital Pathology During a Pandemic.

Journal of pathology informatics·2020
Same author

Role of Telemedicine in Multidisciplinary Team Meetings.

Journal of pathology informatics·2019
Same author

Complete Routine Remote Digital Pathology Services.

Journal of pathology informatics·2018
Same author

Correction: Sudden death associated with silent myocardial infarction in a 35-year-old man: a case report.

Journal of medical case reports·2018
Same author

Remote autopsy services: A feasibility study on nine cases.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues
07:40

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues

Published on: May 1, 2019

5.8K

Diagnostic time in digital pathology: A comparative study on 400 cases.

Aleksandar Vodovnik1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Førde Central Hospital, 6807 Førde, Norway.

Journal of Pathology Informatics
|March 9, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Digital pathology offers a faster diagnostic time than traditional microscopy in routine settings. This efficiency is achieved with integrated systems, stable networks, and advanced workstations, improving pathologist workflow.

Keywords:
Diagnostic timedigital pathologyturnaround

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
07:47

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
07:32

Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis

Published on: April 12, 2024

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues
07:40

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues

Published on: May 1, 2019

5.8K
Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
07:47

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
07:32

Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis

Published on: April 12, 2024

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Digital pathology
  • Medical diagnostics
  • Histopathology

Background:

  • Digital pathology is validated for diagnostics but slower than microscopy.
  • Diagnostic time is a barrier to routine digital pathology adoption.
  • This study compared digital and microscopic diagnostic times in a routine setting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare diagnostic time between digital pathology and traditional microscopy.
  • To identify factors influencing diagnostic time in digital pathology.

Main Methods:

  • 400 consecutive histology and cytology cases were analyzed by one pathologist.
  • Digital diagnosis preceded microscopy diagnosis by 6 months.
  • Diagnostic time was measured from slide availability to diagnosis completion.

Main Results:

  • Digital diagnosis took 1841 minutes, while microscopy took 1956 minutes.
  • Digital diagnosis was faster in 13 out of 20 sessions.
  • Slower digital times occurred with cases requiring high magnifications.

Conclusions:

  • Digital pathology can be faster than microscopy with optimal setup.
  • Integrated LIMS, stable networks, and dual displays are key parameters.
  • Improved ergonomics and reduced slide handling contribute to efficiency gains.