The changing uses of accuracy in science communication

Area of Science:

• Science Communication Research
• Journalism Studies
• Media Studies

Background:

• Historical analysis of accuracy concerns in science communication.
• Resurgence of accuracy, balance, and impartiality debates in the 21st century.
• Influence of traditional news and journalism research on current discourse.

Purpose of the Study:

• To explore historical and contemporary preoccupations with accuracy in science communication.
• To re-evaluate the relevance of journalism research insights for public science communication.
• To identify implications of the changing media environment for science journalism and public discourse.

Main Methods:

• Historical trajectory analysis of science communication research.
• Re-formulation of journalism concepts (voice, access, claims-making) in a constructionist framework.
• Examination of the contemporary media and communications environment.

Main Results:

• Original journalism research insights remain relevant when reframed.
• The current media landscape significantly alters science journalism and public discourse dynamics.
• A wider range of actors now shape public understanding of controversial science.

Conclusions:

• Future research should integrate constructionist perspectives and acknowledge the evolving media ecosystem.
• Understanding 'in whose interest' is crucial for analyzing science communication.
• Adapting to technological, economic, and professional media shifts is vital for accurate public science discourse.