Related Experiment Videos
Impact of nutritional risk screening in hospitalized patients on management, outcome and costs: A retrospective study
Saman Khalatbari-Soltani1, Pedro Marques-Vidal2
1Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Biopole 2, Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010 Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Background & Aims:
Hospitalized patients should be screened for nutritional risk and adequately managed. Being nutritionally 'at-risk' increases in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS) and costs, but the impact on actual costs has seldom been assessed. We aimed to determine nutritional risk screening and management in a Swiss university hospital. The impact of being nutritionally 'at-risk' on in-hospital mortality, LOS and costs was also assessed.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of administrative data for years 2013 and 2014 from the department of internal medicine of the Lausanne university hospital (8541 hospitalizations, mean age 72.8 ± 16.5 years, 50.4% women). Being nutritionally 'at-risk' was defined as a Nutritional risk screening-2002 score ≥ 3 and nutritional managements were collected from medical records.
Results:
Screening increased from 16.5% in 2013 to 41.9% in 2014 (p < 0.001), while prevalence of 'at-risk' patients remained stable (64.6% in 2013 and 62.7% in 2014, p = 0.37). Prevalence of 'at-risk' patients was highest in patients with cancer (85.3% in 2013 and 70.2% in 2014) and lowest in patients with disease of skin (42% in 2013 and 44.8% in 2014). Less than half of patients 'at-risk' received any nutritional management, and this value decreased between 2013 and 2014 (46.9% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, 'at-risk' patients had a 3.7-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.91; 7.03) higher in-hospital mortality and higher costs (excess 5642.25 ± 1479.80 CHF in 2013 and 5529.52 ± 847.02 CHF in 2014, p < 0.001) than 'not at-risk' patients, while no difference was found for LOS.
Conclusion:
Despite an improvement in screening, management of nutritionally 'at-risk' patients is not totally covered yet. Being nutritionally 'at-risk' affects three in every five patients and is associated with increased mortality and hospitalization costs.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...