Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cardiac catheterization in a freestanding setting.

M N Jackson

    Health Technology Assessment Reports
    |January 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Cardiac catheterization is now performed in freestanding settings. Studies show freestanding centers have lower complication rates than inpatient procedures, suggesting acceptable safety and effectiveness.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    National Asthma Education and Prevention Program working group report on the quality of asthma care.

    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·1996
    Same author

    The business of preventing African-American infant mortality.

    The Western journal of medicine·1992
    Same author

    Clinical guidelines development: opportunities for family physicians.

    The Journal of family practice·1991
    Same author

    A lattice model of the thickness-mode piezoelectric transducer.

    IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·1986
    Same author

    Elective hysterectomy: a cost-benefit analysis.

    Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·1978
    Same author

    The rice diet for hypertension.

    Nursing mirror and midwives journal·1951
    Same journal

    Single and double lung transplantation.

    Health technology assessment reports·1991
    Same journal

    Polysomnography and sleep disorder centers.

    Health technology assessment reports·1991
    Same journal

    Hyperthermia in conjunction with cancer chemotherapy.

    Health technology assessment reports·1991
    Same journal

    Intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) therapy.

    Health technology assessment reports·1991
    Same journal

    Cardiac rehabilitation programs.

    Health technology assessment reports·1991
    Same journal

    Surface/specialty coil devices and gating techniques in magnetic resonance imaging.

    Health technology assessment reports·1990
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Healthcare Management

    Background:

    • Cardiac catheterization has expanded beyond traditional hospital settings.
    • Concerns exist regarding the safety and effectiveness of freestanding cardiac catheterization centers.
    • Debate surrounds the risks and benefits of freestanding versus inpatient procedures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cardiac catheterization in freestanding settings.
    • To address claims of increased patient risk in freestanding centers.
    • To compare complication rates between freestanding and inpatient procedures.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of available data on complication rates.
    • Comparison of morbidity and mortality rates in freestanding centers versus inpatient procedures.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of safety and effectiveness in non-hospital settings.
  • Main Results:

    • Freestanding centers report substantially lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to inpatient procedures.
    • Data suggest acceptable safety and effectiveness for selected cardiac catheterizations in freestanding settings.
    • Despite questions about data validity, findings support the viability of freestanding centers.

    Conclusions:

    • Cardiac catheterization can be safely and effectively performed in freestanding settings.
    • Freestanding centers demonstrate favorable outcomes compared to inpatient settings.
    • Further validation of data may be needed, but current evidence supports freestanding procedures.