Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.5K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.5K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

520
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
520
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

692
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
692
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.3K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.1K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.1K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

444
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
444

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hearing Aid Use Attenuates the Association Between Hearing Loss and Frailty: A 2003-2018 NHANES Cross Sectional Analysis.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
Same author

Large-scale genomic surveillance reveals immunosuppression drives mutation dynamics in persistent SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Impacts of the Pacific northwest heat dome on preterm birth rates in Oregon and Washington state.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Comparative Effect of Two Enhanced Prenatal Care Models on Care Experiences: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Inflated Denominators, Selection In Utero, and the Black Male Neonatal Death Paradox.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
Same author

Changes in state-level definitions of fetal death and the reporting of fetal death and periviable live births in the United States, 1996-2021: A panel study.

Annals of epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Auricular Point Acupressure Therapy: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Postsurgical Abortion Recovery
07:02

Auricular Point Acupressure Therapy: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Postsurgical Abortion Recovery

Published on: February 3, 2026

135

Shared risk aversion in spontaneous and induced abortion.

Ralph Catalano1, Tim A Bruckner2, Deborah Karasek3

  • 1School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA rayc@berkeley.edu.

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|March 12, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Risk aversion correlates with both spontaneous and non-clinically indicated induced abortions, suggesting it influences conscious and non-conscious mechanisms controlling pregnancy outcomes. This implies decisions about continuing gestation are influenced by perceived costs and benefits.

Keywords:
abortionenvironmental effectsepidemiologypregnancypregnancy terminationrisk aversion

More Related Videos

Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations
10:45

Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations

Published on: June 14, 2020

8.1K
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

16.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Auricular Point Acupressure Therapy: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Postsurgical Abortion Recovery
07:02

Auricular Point Acupressure Therapy: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Postsurgical Abortion Recovery

Published on: February 3, 2026

135
Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations
10:45

Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations

Published on: June 14, 2020

8.1K
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

16.0K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Evolutionary Psychology

Background:

  • Risk aversion is theorized to enhance Darwinian fitness and influence conscious and non-conscious decisions.
  • These decisions may impact prospective offspring investment, affecting abortion rates over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlation between spontaneous abortion incidence and non-clinically indicated induced abortion incidence.
  • To determine if shared risk aversion influences both types of abortion within conception cohorts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Danish registry data from January 1995 to December 2009 (180 months).
  • Analyzed 1,351,800 gestations, including 156,780 spontaneous and 233,280 induced abortions.
  • Employed Box-Jenkins transfer functions and cross-correlation to assess associations, adjusting for autocorrelation, cohort size, and anomalies.

Main Results:

  • A positive association was found between spontaneous and non-clinically indicated induced abortions.
  • Conception cohorts with higher-than-expected spontaneous abortions also showed higher rates of non-clinically indicated induced abortions.

Conclusions:

  • Findings suggest risk aversion impacts both conscious and non-conscious mechanisms controlling parturition.
  • Abortion decisions, whether spontaneous or induced, appear linked to a woman's assessment of gestation costs/benefits.
  • Results may be limited to Denmark's registration system and population.