Coronary Flow Reserve and Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Joo Myung Lee1, Ji-Hyun Jung1, Doyeon Hwang1

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Insights

Microvascular dysfunction, assessed by coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), impacts prognosis in patients with high fractional flow reserve (FFR). Low CFR with high IMR indicates poor outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Prognostic significance of microvascular status in high fractional flow reserve (FFR) patients remains unclear.
  • FFR alone may not fully capture the risk associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the prognostic implications of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients undergoing FFR measurement.
  • Assess the added value of microvascular parameters in risk stratification.

Main Methods:

  • Patients with high FFR (>0.80) were categorized into four groups based on CFR (≤2) and IMR (≥23 U) levels.
  • Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization was assessed.
  • Median follow-up was 658 days.

Main Results:

  • Modest correlation and agreement were observed between FFR and CFR.
  • Low CFR was associated with higher POCO.
  • Patients with low CFR and high IMR exhibited the highest POCO (p=0.002).
  • Overt microvascular disease, multivessel disease, and diabetes mellitus independently predicted POCO.
  • Physiological indices significantly improved predictive model discrimination.

Conclusions:

  • Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) enhance risk stratification in patients with high FFR.
  • Low CFR combined with high IMR signifies a poor prognosis.
  • Microvascular assessment is crucial for comprehensive risk evaluation in these patients.
Abstract