Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Neuronavigation and Laparoscopy Guided Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion for the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Published on: October 14, 2022
The Preventable Shunt Revision Rate: a potential quality metric for pediatric shunt surgery
Garrett T Venable1, Nicholas B Rossi2, G Morgan Jones2,3
1College of Medicine and
Insights
A significant portion of pediatric shunt surgeries result in revision due to preventable causes like infection or incorrect catheter placement. The study proposes the Preventable Shunt Revision Rate (PSRR) as a quality metric for pediatric shunt surgery.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurosurgery
- Health Services Research
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Shunt surgery is resource-intensive in pediatric neurosurgery.
- Existing literature lacks consensus on shunt failure risk factors.
- There is a need for effective quality outcome measures for shunt surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose the Preventable Shunt Revision Rate (PSRR) as a novel quality metric for pediatric shunt surgery.
- To analyze causes and characteristics of preventable shunt failures.
Main Methods:
- Querying an institutional shunt database for surgeries between 2010-2014.
- Reviewing patient records for 90-day outcomes post-index surgery.
- Analyzing clinical, demographic, and radiological factors for preventable failures.
Main Results:
- 21.8% of 927 shunt surgeries required reoperation within 90 days.
- Potentially preventable causes accounted for 33% of failures (67 cases).
- Younger patients and earlier failure (within 30 days) were associated with preventable causes; inaccurate catheter placement and infection were most common.
Conclusions:
- The PSRR is proposed as a specific, measurable, and modifiable quality metric for pediatric shunt surgery.
- Not all shunt revisions indicate suboptimal care; many causes are surgeon-independent.
- Careful consideration is needed when implementing quality measures for shunt surgery.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE Shunt surgery consumes a large amount of pediatric neurosurgical health care resources. Although many studies have sought to identify risk factors for shunt failure, there is no consensus within the literature on variables that are predictive or protective. In this era of "quality outcome measures," some authors have proposed various metrics to assess quality outcomes for shunt surgery. In this paper, the Preventable Shunt Revision Rate (PSRR) is proposed as a novel quality metric. METHODS An institutional shunt database was queried to identify all shunt surgeries performed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital. Patients' records were reviewed for 90 days following each "index" shunt surgery to identify those patients who required a return to the operating room. Clinical, demographic, and radiological factors were reviewed for each index operation, and each failure was analyzed for potentially preventable causes. RESULTS During the study period, there were 927 de novo or revision shunt operations in 525 patients. A return to the operating room occurred 202 times within 90 days of shunt surgery in 927 index surgeries (21.8%). In 67 cases (33% of failures), the revision surgery was due to potentially preventable causes, defined as inaccurate proximal or distal catheter placement, infection, or inadequately secured or assembled shunt apparatus. Comparing cases in which failure was due to preventable causes and those in which it was due to nonpreventable causes showed that in cases in which failure was due to preventable causes, the patients were significantly younger (median 3.1 vs 6.7 years, p = 0.01) and the failure was more likely to occur within 30 days of the index surgery (80.6% vs 64.4% of cases, p = 0.02). The most common causes of preventable shunt failure were inaccurate proximal catheter placement (33 [49.3%] of 67 cases) and infection (28 [41.8%] of 67 cases). No variables were found to be predictive of preventable shunt failure with multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS With economic and governmental pressures to identify and implement "quality measures" for shunt surgery, pediatric neurosurgeons and hospital administrators must be careful to avoid linking all shunt revisions with "poor" or less-than-optimal quality care. To date, many of the purported risk factors for shunt failure and causes of shunt revision surgery are beyond the influence and control of the surgeon. We propose the PSRR as a specific, meaningful, measurable, and-hopefully-modifiable quality metric for shunt surgery in children.

