Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Trans-Tympanic Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Ototoxicity
Published on: March 16, 2018
Chloral hydrate sedation for auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing in children: Safety and effectiveness
Dianne G Valenzuela1, Divjot Singh Kumar1, Cheryl Labelle Atkins2
1University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, 317-2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6 T 1Z3.
Insights
Nurse-led oral chloral hydrate sedation is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia for auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing in children. This method reliably sedates pediatric patients, enabling accurate hearing assessments with minimal complications.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric audiology
- Sedation medicine
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing is crucial for identifying hearing loss in infants and children.
- General anesthesia for ABR testing carries inherent risks and costs.
- Oral chloral hydrate sedation offers a potential alternative for ABR procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nurse-led oral chloral hydrate sedation for ABR testing.
- To assess ABR testing outcomes in pediatric patients sedated with chloral hydrate.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of medical and audiology records (2004-2012).
- Analysis of 725 ABR tests in children aged 6 months to 17 years.
- Inclusion of data on drug dosage, patient condition, adverse effects, and sedation success rates.
Main Results:
- Chloral hydrate (average 52mg/kg) successfully sedated children in 95.9% of cases.
- 80.8% of ABR tests were completed without any incident.
- Adverse events, including apnea and bradycardia, occurred in a small percentage of cases and typically resolved without intervention.
Conclusions:
- Nurse-led chloral hydrate sedation is a safe and reliable method for pediatric ABR testing.
- This approach provides a valuable alternative to general anesthesia in ambulatory care settings.
- Findings support the wider adoption of this sedation strategy for ABR procedures globally.
Introduction:
The auditory brainstem response (ABR) test is used to identify hearing loss and measure hearing thresholds of infants and children who cannot be tested using standard behavioral hearing testing methods. In order for the ABR to yield useful data, a child must be asleep throughout the duration of the test. In many centers, this is achieved through the use of a general anesthetic, with its inherent risks and costs. Since 2004, ABRs have been routinely conducted at BC Children's Hospital in an ambulatory care setting under oral chloral hydrate sedation, with monitoring by a specialist nurse. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of nurse-led sedation with chloral hydrate for ABR testing at our tertiary pediatric center.
Methods:
Medical and audiology records were reviewed for children aged 6 months to 17 years who underwent ABR testing from 2004 to 2012. We reviewed the dosage of drug used, condition of the child after chloral hydrate administration, adverse effects, audiological results, patients' vital signs, and the effectiveness of the sedative in keeping the child asleep throughout the duration of the test. Frequency distributions were derived for adverse outcomes.
Results:
725 ABR records encompassing 635 children (multiple ABR tests in some children) were reviewed. The average dose of chloral hydrate used was 52mg/kg. The majority of sedated ABR's (80.8%) were completed without any incident. Significant events [apnea and/or bradycardia], minor complications [vomiting, hypoxemia, prolonged sedation, and/or tachypnea] and restlessness were noted in 3.4%, 6.2%, and 5.0% of the cases, respectively. The majority of these issues resolved without medical intervention, such as the need to provide supplementary oxygen. In 95.9% of ABRs, chloral hydrate was successful in sedating the child adequately to answer the audiological question.
Conclusions:
This forms the largest study to date on oral sedation for ABR testing. Based on our results, the use of chloral hydrate in the presence of a sedation nurse was a safe and reliable method of performing ABR in infants and children. This may be of significant value to centres worldwide exploring alternatives to general anesthesia for ABR testing.
More Related Videos
08:38Electroretinogram Recording for Infants and Children under Anesthesia to Achieve Optimal Dark Adaptation and International Standards
Published on: September 3, 2020
09:23Auditory Brainstem Response and Outer Hair Cell Whole-cell Patch Clamp Recording in Postnatal Rats
Published on: May 24, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...