c-Met and ERβ expression differences in basal-like and non-basal-like triple-negative breast cancer

Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are two entities of breast cancer that share similar poor prognosis. Even though both cancers have overlaps, there are still some differences between those two types. It has been reported that the c-Met high expression was associated with poor prognosis not only in breast cancer but also in many other cancers. The role of ERβ in pathogenesis and treatment of breast cancer has remained controversial. In this study, we firstly distinguished basal-like from nonbasal-like cancer patients in TNBC patients using CK5/6 and EGFR as markers and next determined the relationship of basal-like breast cancer with c-Met or ERβ expression levels and prognosis in TNBC patients. One hundred twenty-seven patients who had been diagnosed with TNBC were enrolled. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients were recorded. The expression of EGFR, CK5/6, ERβ, and c-Met were evaluated with immunohistochemical methods using paraffin blocks. The median age of patients was 50.7 years. CK5/6 immunopositivity was 31.5 % (40/127), and EGFR was 40.2 % (51/127). Of the TNBC cases, 55.1 % (71/127) were positive for either CK5/6 or EGFR and were thus classified as basal-like breast cancer. C-Met (P < 0.001) and ERβ (P = 0.002) overexpression, small tumor sizes, a ductal subtype, and high-grade tumor were significantly correlated with BLBC. High c-Met expression was detected in 43.3 % patients. Metastatic lymph nodes and tumor size (>5 cm), which were both important prognostic predictors, were significantly associated with recurrence and mortality. BLBC typically demonstrates a unique profile. CK5/6 and EGFR expression combination indicates a higher basal-like phenotype possibility. The expression of c-Met and ERβ were significantly related to the basal-like phenotype. The classical markers, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size were found to have important prognostic value. However, high c-Met expression and basal-like phenotypes did not show a direct correlation with poor prognosis.