Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) - Imaging and staging

Tobias Baumann1, Christof Rottenburger2, Guillaume Nicolas3

  • 1Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Insights

Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR PET/CT) is the preferred molecular imaging for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs). While effective, SSTR PET/CT and scintigraphy have limitations, with new innovations showing promise for improved GEP-NET detection.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Morphological imaging (CT, MRI) is standard for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (GEP-NET) detection and treatment monitoring.
  • Molecular imaging, especially hybrid imaging (PET/CT), enhances patient management through improved tumor localization and staging.
  • Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) and somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positron emission tomography (PET) are crucial for diagnosing well-differentiated GEP-NETs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role and limitations of current molecular imaging techniques in GEP-NET diagnosis.
  • To compare the efficacy of SSTR PET/CT with SRS and other PET tracers.
  • To highlight emerging innovations for improved GEP-NET imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on molecular imaging for GEP-NETs.
  • Comparison of SSTR PET/CT, SRS, (18)F-DOPA PET/CT, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT.
  • Discussion of limitations and potential of novel imaging agents and techniques.

Main Results:

  • SSTR PET/CT is superior to SRS for well-differentiated GEP-NETs and should be prioritized.
  • (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG PET/CT are less effective than SSTR PET/CT in well-differentiated GEP-NETs.
  • SSTR PET/CT and SRS show limitations in detecting benign insulinomas, poorly differentiated GEP-NETs, and liver metastases.

Conclusions:

  • SSTR PET/CT is the leading molecular imaging modality for GEP-NETs, offering advantages over SRS.
  • Current techniques have limitations, necessitating further research and development.
  • Emerging technologies like SSTR PET/MRI and GLP-1R agonists hold potential for advancing GEP-NET imaging.