Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Three-dimensional Quantification of Intestinal Mucus Using Whole-mount Tissue Imaging
Published on: September 12, 2025
An Advanced Histologic Method for Evaluation of Intestinal Adenomas in Mice Using Digital Slides
Jennifer S Davis1, Vineet Gupta1, Mihai Gagea2
1Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, Unit 1013, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Background And Methods:
Mice are used for modelling the biology of many human diseases, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Mouse models recapitulate many aspects of human disease and are invaluable tools for studying the biology, treatment and prevention of CRC. Unlike humans, many mouse models develop lesions primarily in the small intestine, which necessitates removal and examination of this organ in order to evaluate treatment efficacy. Commonly, the small intestine is visually examined for gross lesions and then selectively embedded in paraffin blocks for further microscopic analysis. Unfortunately, this method suffers from inherent bias toward counting large lesions and simultaneously missing smaller lesions. Even more, this method leaves no permanent record of diagnosed and measured lesions. We evaluated inter-observer variability in a mouse model of CRC using visual examination, and directly compared the visual, gross examination with a histologic analytic method using digital slides of hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections.
Results:
Using visual examination, there was a high degree of inter-observer variability. As this method does not provide a permanent record of measurements, there is no capability to arbitrate between differing observations. In contrast, histologic analysis allowed for the creation of a permanent record of lesion measurements taken. When compared directly, histologic analysis of annotated digital images has significantly improved accuracy. Using this method we were able to distinguish mutant mice from wild type littermates even at a very young age. With gross visual examination, this distinction was not possible.
Conclusion:
Histologic analysis of digital images of murine intestinal tissue provides a vital improvement over the commonly used visual, gross examination method. Unlike visual gross examination, histologic analysis is not biased by the size of intestinal adenoma, misdiagnosis of another lesion type, or presence of a Peyer's patch. It also provides accountability in the form of a permanent record of lesions counted. Histologic analysis using digital slides represents a critical improvement over the current, widely used method of visual gross examination and should be considered for future studies using mouse models of CRC.
Insights
Histologic analysis of digital slides significantly improves accuracy in mouse models of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to visual examination. This method provides a permanent, unbiased record, enhancing lesion detection and differentiation between mutant and wild-type mice.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Animal Models
- Pathology
Background:
- Mouse models are crucial for studying human diseases like colorectal cancer (CRC).
- Current methods for evaluating CRC in mouse models, primarily visual gross examination of the small intestine, have limitations.
- Visual examination is prone to bias, missing small lesions and lacking a permanent record.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate inter-observer variability in a mouse model of CRC.
- To compare the accuracy of visual gross examination with histologic analysis using digital slides.
- To determine if digital histologic analysis improves lesion detection and differentiation in mouse models.
Main Methods:
- Mice were used to model colorectal cancer (CRC).
- Small intestines were examined for lesions using both visual gross examination and histologic analysis of digital slides.
- Inter-observer variability was assessed for the visual method, and accuracy was compared between methods.
Main Results:
- Visual examination showed high inter-observer variability and lacked a permanent record.
- Histologic analysis of digital slides created a permanent record of lesion measurements.
- Digital histologic analysis significantly improved accuracy, enabling distinction between mutant and wild-type mice, which was not possible with visual examination.
Conclusions:
- Histologic analysis of digital images is a significant improvement over visual gross examination for murine intestinal tissue.
- This method is unbiased by lesion size, misdiagnosis, or Peyer's patches, and provides accountability through a permanent record.
- Digital slide analysis should be considered for future studies using mouse models of CRC to enhance accuracy and reliability.
More Related Videos
07:05Important Endpoints and Proliferative Markers to Assess Small Intestinal Injury and Adaptation using a Mouse Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis
Published on: May 12, 2019
07:48Protocols for Analyzing the Role of Paneth Cells in Regenerating the Murine Intestine using Conditional Cre-lox Mouse Models
Published on: November 21, 2015