Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Coronary artery bypass surgery vs coronary angioplasty: from antithesis to synthesis
Insights
Revascularization therapy, including coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, improves coronary artery disease management. Ongoing trials compare these treatments for multivessel disease to optimize patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
Background:
- Revascularization therapy has significantly advanced coronary artery disease (CAD) management over the past 20 years.
- Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a proven treatment for alleviating symptoms, preventing myocardial infarction, and improving survival in moderate to severe CAD.
- Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is increasingly used as an alternative, expanding to single-vessel, multivessel disease, and acute ischemic syndromes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
- To address concerns regarding procedure-related mortality and restenosis rates associated with PTCA.
- To compare the efficacy and outcomes of PTCA versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in multivessel CAD.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing randomized trials and clinical data on PTCA and CABG for coronary artery disease.
- Analysis of ongoing randomized clinical trials (e.g., CABRI, RITA, GABI, EAST, BARI) comparing PTCA and CABG.
- Assessment of angiographic success rates, long-term results, mortality, and restenosis rates.
Main Results:
- Angiographic success rates for PTCA exceed 90% in properly selected cases.
- Limited data exist on the long-term outcomes of PTCA for multivessel coronary artery disease.
- Procedure-related mortality and restenosis remain significant concerns for PTCA.
Conclusions:
- Ongoing randomized trials are crucial for comparing PTCA and CABG in multivessel coronary artery disease.
- These studies will provide essential information to guide revascularization strategies for optimal patient benefit.
- Further research is needed to fully elucidate the long-term efficacy and safety of PTCA compared to CABG.
Abstract:
Over the last two decades, revascularization therapy has greatly improved the management of patients with coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been proven by several randomized trials to alleviate symptoms, prevent myocardial infarction, and prolong survival in patients with moderately severe disease. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has emerged as an alternative treatment for an increasing number of these patients. The use of coronary angioplasty has been expanding rapidly to include single-vessel and multivessel disease and acute ischaemic syndromes. Although the angiographic success rate in properly selected cases exceeds 90%, there are limited data regarding the long-term results with angioplasty in the treatment of patients with multivessel disease. Procedure-related mortality and restenosis rate remain major areas of concern. Several randomized clinical trials (CABRI, RITA, GABI, EAST, BARI) currently in progress are comparing PTCA and CABG in the management of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. It is anticipated that these studies will provide a wealth of information, enabling physicians to construct a revascularization strategy that will maximally benefit their patients.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

