Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
Factors associated with removal of a radial head prosthesis placed for acute trauma
Amir Reza Kachooei1, Femke M A P Claessen2, Samantha M Chase3
1Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Purpose:
This study tests the hypothesis that there are no factors associated with removal or revision of a radial head prosthesis. A secondary analysis addressed the time to removal or revision.
Methods:
We reviewed the database of two large hospitals from 2000 to 2014 and identified 278 patients that had radial head replacement after an acute fracture or fracture dislocation of the elbow: 19 had removal and 3 had revision of the radial head implant within the study period. Explanatory variables including demographics, the type of injury, prosthesis type, surgeon, medical centre, and associated injuries were evaluated. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated time to removal/revision.
Results:
After adjustment for potential confounders using Cox regression multivariable analysis, hospital was the only factor independently associated with removal or revision (Hazard ratio=2.4, Confidence interval: 1.03-5.8, P value=0.043). The highest proportion of removal/revision was during the first year after implantation and decreased by half each year over the second to fourth years. The most common reason for removal of the prosthesis was to facilitate removal of heterotopic ossification (the majority with proximal radioulnar synostosis) rather than technical error or problems with the prostheses.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that the decision to remove a radial head prosthesis may depend more on surgeon or hospital preferences than on objective problems with the prosthesis. Until clarified by additional study, removal of a prosthesis should not be considered an objective outcome in research. In addition, patients offered removal of a radial head prosthesis, might get the opinion of more than one surgeon at more than one hospital before deciding whether or not to proceed.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III Prognostic.
Related Concept Videos
Bones of the Upper Limb: Radius
The radius has a nail-shaped head, and a...
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus
Bones of the Upper Limb: Ulna
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

