Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
The effect of simple imputation on inferences about population means when data are missing in biomedical research due
Hongyue Wang1, Guanqing Chen1, Xiang Lu1
1Departments of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Abstract:
The sample geometric mean has been widely used in biomedical and psychosocial research to estimate and compare population geometric means. However, due to the detection limit of measurement instruments, the actual value of the measurement is not always observable. A common practice to deal with this problem is to replace missing values by small positive constants and make inferences based on the imputed data. However, no work has been carried out to study the effect of this naïve imputation method on inference. In this report, we show that this simple imputation method may dramatically change the reported outcomes of a study and, thus, make the results uninterpretable, even if the detection limit is very small.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Censoring Survival Data
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...

